Features of the legal nature of preemptive rights
- Authors: Maksurov A.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Yaroslavl State University
- Issue: No 1 (2026)
- Pages: 23-28
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://vektornaukipravo.ru/jour/article/view/704
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18323/3034-2945-2026-1-64-3
- ID: 704
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The paper considers issues related to determining the place of preemptive rights within the system of legal
relations. The purpose of the study is to define the legal nature of preemptive rights and substantiate their place within
the system of subjective civil rights. The author used dialectical and formal-logical methods, analysis, and synthesis.
Through the combined use of these methods, the main results of the legal regulation of preemptive rights were established.
Particular attention is paid to determining whether the understanding of legal advantages corresponds to the approach of
interpreting them as subjective rights. The paper states that the current directions of development of the institution of
preemptive rights are quite diverse and poorly coordinated with each other. This circumstance makes it difficult to determine the legal nature of preemptive civil rights. The author points out the futility of the debate on whether preemptive
rights are limited property rights or obligatory rights, since a preemptive right in specific legal relations can be both
a property right and an obligatory right. According to the author, only some preemptive rights can be classified as secondary rights, and secondarity is not an immanent property of any preemptive right. The existing views on the nature of
preemptive rights are systematised, and trends in their development are identified. The justification for establishing
a preemptive right to regulate specific social relations depends on the essence of the purpose of its establishment. Any advantages granted to participants in civil transactions limit the freedom of other participants and violate their equality; however, they are determined by socially significant goals and are therefore permissible. The paper also proposes to ensure
a wide possibility of applying preemptive rights by virtue of a contract, since in some cases this is hindered by existing
legislative approaches, as well as to allow the transferability of preemptive rights.
About the authors
Aleksey A. Maksurov
Yaroslavl State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: maxurov78@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5781-6524
PhD (Law),
lecturer of Chair of Theory and History of State and Law.
References
- Maksurov A.A., Makarov I.I. Koordinatsiya v prave [Coordination in law]. Yaroslavl, YaF MFYuA Publ., 2012. 320 p.
- Vlasov A.A. Grazhdanskoe ispolnitelnoe pravo [Civil enforcement law]. Moscow, Ekzamen Publ., 2004. 350 p.
- Maksurov A.A. Coordination of the implementation of migration legislation in the countries of Europe. Legal order: History, Theory, Practice, 2018, no. 2, pp. 6–12. EDN: XWPVHN.
- Sklovskiy K., Smirnova M. The institution of preferential purchase in Russian and foreign law. Economy and Law, 2003, no. 10, pp. 88–98.
- Babaev A.B. Second rights. Grazhdanskoe pravo: aktualnye problemy teorii i praktiki. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2015. Vol. 1, pp. 291–339.
- Kramskoy V.V. Structure of secondary law. Current Issues of the State and Law, 2023, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 493–503. doi: 10.20310/2587-9340-2023-7-4-493-503.
- Dergunov A.A. Preemptive rights in the system of legal advantages: aspects of the ratio. Prologue: Law Journal, 2022, no. 3, pp. 34–43. EDN: VEVIQF.
- Repev A.G. Category «privilege»: doctrine, legislation, practice. Vestnik of the St. Petersburg university of the ministry of internal affairs of Russia, 2020, no. 1, pp. 53–60. doi: 10.35750/2071-8284-2020-1-53-60.
- Dergunov A.A. Historical and legal analysis of the genesis of pre-emptive law as a general theoretical phenomenon. Genesis: Historical research, 2022, no. 5, pp. 73–86. doi: 10.25136/2409-868X.2022.5.38132.
- Zaypulaeva T.M. Application of corporate agreement in hereditary legal relations: problems of theory and practice. Theory and Practice of Social Development, 2024, no. 5, pp. 268–275. doi: 10.24158/tipor.2024.5.36.
- Sukhanov E.A., ed. Grazhdanskoe pravo. Obshchaya chast [Civil Law. The general part]. 3-e ed., pererab. i dop. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2023. Vol. 1, 590 p.
- Alekseev S.S. The Subject of Soviet Civil Law and the Method of Civil Law Regulation. Antologiya uralskoy tsivilistiki, 1925 – 1989: sbornik statey. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2001, pp. 7–53.
- Vitryanskiy V.V. Some results of the codification of legal norms on civil law contracts. Kodifikatsiya rossiyskogo chastnogo prava. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2008, pp. 94–149.
- Yakovlev V.F. Izbrannye trudy. Grazhdanskoe pravo. Istoriya i sovremennost [Selected Works. Civil Law. History and Modernity]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2012. 349 p.
- Maksurov A.A. On ways to overcome the ban on leasing public real estate in sublease. Themis.Science, 2025, no. 1, pp. 50–58. EDN: GHSZID.
- Maksurov A.A. Aktualnye problemy otchuzhdeniya aktsiy i doley v ustavnom kapitale khozyaystvennykh obshchestv [Current issues of alienation of stocks and shares in the authorized capital of business companies]. Moscow, Yustitsinform Publ., 2021. 176 p. EDN: GDFJAS.
- Maksurov A.A. Nasledovanie v Rossii i za rubezhom: sravnitelno-pravovoe issledovanie [Inheritance in Russia and abroad: a comparative legal study]. Moscow, Vuzovskaya kniga Publ., 2020. 79 p.
Supplementary files


