Distortion by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of the purpose of the institution of returning a criminal case to the prosecutor
- Authors: Leonova E.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Academician S.P. Korolev Samara National Research University
- Issue: No 2 (2026)
- Pages: 25-33
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://vektornaukipravo.ru/jour/article/view/716
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18323/3034-2945-2026-2-65-3
- ID: 716
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Abstract: The institution of returning a criminal case to the prosecutor was introduced by the legislator into the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation for the purpose of eliminating procedural (unrelated to the collection of evidence) violations of criminal procedure law committed in pretrial proceedings, which preclude the possibility of considering the criminal case. However, numerous amendments to Article 237 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation have legitimised judicial interference in the investigation process, contrary to the principle of adversarial proceedings. Employing dialectical, systemic, and formal-legal methods, the author analyses the change in judicial practice approaches to the application of the institution of returning a criminal case to the prosecutor. The author demonstrates that the institution under consideration a) was created to shield the court from performing functions not inherent to it; b) is applied contrary to its intended purpose; and (c) operates in contradiction to the principles of the presumption of innocence and adversarial proceedings. The study showed that the institution of returning a criminal case to the prosecutor is applied by judges as a means of directing the procedural activities of criminal prosecution bodies, through which the judge not only manages pretrial proceedings but also initiates and directs prosecutorial activity, which results in the supplementation of deficiencies in the preliminary investigation and the change of charges to more serious ones. However, such activity of the court diverges from the objective that pursued the legislator when replacing the institution of returning the case for additional investigation with the institution of returning the case for the elimination of obstacles to its consideration by the court. The author concludes that the powers of the court, as well as the criminal procedural mechanisms applied by the court, should be analysed based on the idea of the presumption of innocence, and the further improvement of criminal procedure should follow the path of organising the criminal procedural activity of the court on the basis of the presumption of innocence.
About the authors
Elena V. Leonova
Academician S.P. Korolev Samara National Research University
Author for correspondence.
Email: lev0329@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-5044-7846
postgraduate student
Russian Federation, 443086, Russia, Samara, Moskovskoye Shosse, 34.References
- Zakidalskiy D.E. Current issues in the application of Article 237 of the russian criminal procedure code: analysis of 2025 practice in light of the new explanations by the plenum of the supreme court of the Russian Federation. Ex jure, 2026, no. 1, pp. 98–108. EDN: NIUMJO.
- Khalikov A.N. Return of the criminal case to the prosecutor as a basis for additional investigation: problems and possible solutions. Russian Investigator, 2025, no. 5, pp. 25–29. doi: 10.18572/1812-3783-2025-5-25-29.
- Bydantsev N.A., Konin V.V. Returning of a criminal case to the prosecutor: an analysis of the legal positions of the plenum of the supreme court of the Russian Federation. Kriminalist, 2025, no. 1, pp. 16–25. EDN: BQOKRR.
- Zaytseva e.A. Returning a criminal case to the prosecutor and balancing public and private interests. The rule-of-law state: theory and practice, 2025, no. 1, pp. 59–68. doi: 10.33184/pravgos-2025.1.6.
- Tatyanina A.V., Shevchenko A.A. Rounds and procedure for returning a criminal case to the prosecutor: analysis of the provisions of the plenum resolution No. 39 of the supreme court of the Russian Federation dated 12.17.2024 Part 1. Vestnik Taganrogskogo instituta upravleniya i ekonomiki, 2025, no. 1, pp. 53–57. EDN: JYHMBK.
- Karyagina O.V., Tatyanina A.V., Shevchenko A.A. Grounds and procedure for returning a criminal case to the prosecutor: analysis of the provisions of the plenum resolution No. 39 of the supreme court of the Russian Federation dated 12.17.2024 Part 2. Vestnik Taganrogskogo instituta upravleniya i ekonomiki, 2025, no. 2, pp. 61–67. EDN: UWAGLH.
- Kuryakhova T.V. Court decision to return a criminal case to the prosecutor in the system of intermediate judicial acts. Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Economics and Law, 2024, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 127–133. EDN: WDFAMG.
- Kalnitskiy V.V., Kuryakhova T.V. The further step of the constitutional court of the russian federation in the development of the institution of returning a criminal case to the prosecutor. Scientific Bulletin of the Omsk Academy of the MIA of Russia, 2022, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 310–317. EDN: FNQXAH.
- Azarov V., Baranov A., Suprun S. Returning a criminal case for additional investigation: legal consciousness and law, interpretation and application. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2004, no. 2, pp. 84–86. EDN: LGSLBM.
- Trisheva A.A. Remanding a criminal case to a public prosecutor: destiny of the institute. Zakonnost, 2015, no. 4, pp. 50–55. EDN: TPHYBN.
- Kalnitskiy V. V., Kuryakhova T. The legal position of the constitutional court of the russian federation about the question of criminal case's returning to the pre-judicial production. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2009, no. 4, pp. 96–100. EDN: KVKOVX.
- Shiplyuk V.A. The constitutional and legal meaning of the institution of returning the criminal case to the prosecutor by the court (in the light of the decision of the constitutional court of the russian federation of 2 july 2013 № 16-p). Kriminalist, 2013, no. 2, pp. 71–76. EDN: VZJLEJ.
- Shishkov A.A. The return of the court the criminal case to the prosecutor: institute of instability. Vestnik of economic security, 2016, no. 5, pp. 69–72. EDN: YKMGTN.
- Gavrilov B.Ya. The institution of court remand of a criminal case: past, present and future. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 2026, no. 2, pp. 9–15. EDN: LBMKIM.
- Chekulaev D.P. The return of the criminal case to the prosecutor: the reasons for the institution and its prospects. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 2026, no. 2, pp. 49–53. EDN: WMIOMJ.
- Esakov G.A., Pleshanova O.P., Ivanov A.A., Shramko V.I. Legal chronicle. Zakon, 2025, no. 2, pp. 101–119. doi: 10.37239/0869-4400-2025-22-2-101-119.
- Kalnitskiy V.V., Kuryakhova T.V. Special procedure for the activities of the prosecutor and the investigative bodies on a criminal case returned by the court. Scientific Bulletin of the Omsk Academy of the MIA of Russia, 2021, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 306– 311. EDN: UHQESW.
- Burmagin S.V. The criminal procedure form vs. Procedural technologies. Criminal Judicial Proceeding, 2025, no. 2, pp. 34–39. doi: 10.18572/2072-4411-2025-2-34-39.
- Ryabinina T.K. Institute of returning a criminal case to the prosecutor in the system of criminally-remedial means, ensuring the victim's right to protection from crime and access to justice. Russian Journal of criminology, 2020, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 512–526. doi: 10.17150/2500-4255.2020.14(3).512-526.
- Golovko L.V. Sources and the prospect for the institute of the additional investigation of criminal cases on the post-soviet space. State and Law, 2009, no. 11, pp. 54–67. EDN: LKSCSF.
- Gusak V.V. The place of crime investigation management in the system of criminal procedure functions. Bulletin of ufa law institute of the ministry of internal affairs of Russia, 2020, no. 3, pp. 81–88. EDN: JBRECH.
Supplementary files


