<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Jus strictum</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Jus strictum</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Jus strictum</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">3034-2945</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">3034-4212</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Togliatti State University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">443</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18323/2220-7457-2023-1-23-32</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">The concept of state sovereignty in the modern period</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Концепция государственного суверенитета в современный период</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6038-3504</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Pyatkin</surname><given-names>Valery Nikolaevich</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Пяткин</surname><given-names>Валерий Николаевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>senior lecturer of Chair of State and Administrative Law</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>старший преподаватель кафедры государственного и административного права</p></bio><email>speranzo2@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University, Saransk</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Национальный исследовательский Мордовский государственный университет имени Н.П. Огарёва, Саранск</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-03-31" publication-format="electronic"><day>31</day><month>03</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>23</fpage><lpage>32</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2023-03-30"><day>30</day><month>03</month><year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vektornaukipravo.ru/jour/article/view/443">https://vektornaukipravo.ru/jour/article/view/443</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Understanding, development, and significance of state sovereignty in international and domestic relations are a constant and burning issue of scientific research. However, over the last years, there is a growing tendency in the foreign and Russian science aimed at the disavowal of the concept of the sovereignty as an inalienable, undivided, and absolute power of the state, which leads both to the scientific disputes and the growth of tension at the state-by-state (international) level. The abovementioned determined the goal of this work: the scientific substantiation of the sovereignty as the most important, enduring characteristic and the base attribute of a state, as well as the formation of the concept according to which state sovereignty should be considered as a political and legal axiom aimed at the creation of a modern secure world order. The understanding of state sovereignty developed over several centuries includes the ability of a state to form and implement an individual, independent, and integral foreign and domestic policy, which means the supremacy of the state in the domestic and foreign policy. However, there are significant disagreements in understanding the nature, scope, implementation mechanism, and other factors of the formation and development of state sovereignty. In the paper, the author attempts to comprehend the pluralism of views on the concept of state sovereignty and to identify the consequences of artificial reducing the authority of the state sovereignty concept, proposes the justification for the inadmissibility of its disavowal. The author concludes that the concept of state sovereignty is actually the most important property of any state and scarcely depends on the influence of external factors, i.e. the sovereignty of the state cannot be limited since this contradicts, first of all, to its essence, and the disparagement and appeals to the state sovereignty abolition are the most dangerous tendency significantly increasing the level of tension in the world. State sovereignty is a symbol, the ideological framework of the world order and the existence of any state.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Понимание, развитие и значение государственного суверенитета в международных и внутригосударственных отношениях – постоянная и актуальнейшая тема научных исследований. Однако в последние годы в зарубежной и российской науке укрепляется тенденция, направленная на дезавуирование концепции суверенитета как неотчуждаемой, неделимой и неограниченной власти государства, что приводит не только к научным спорам, но и к возрастанию напряженности на межгосударственном (международном) уровне. Вышесказанное определило цель работы: научное обоснование суверенитета как наиважнейшей, непоколебимой характеристики и основного признака государства, а также формирование концепции, в соответствии с которой государственный суверенитет необходимо рассматривать как политико-правовую аксиому, направленную на создание современного безопасного миропорядка. Сложившееся за несколько веков понимание государственного суверенитета включает в себя способность государства формировать и реализовывать самостоятельную, независимую и целостную внешнюю и внутреннюю политику, что означает верховенство государства во внутренней и внешней политике. Однако имеются существенные разногласия в понимании природы, объема, механизма реализации и иных факторов формирования и развития государственного суверенитета. В работе предпринята попытка осмыслить плюрализм взглядов на понятие «государственный суверенитет», выявить последствия искусственного снижения авторитета концепции государственного суверенитета, предложено обоснование недопустимости его дезавуирования. Автор приходит к выводу, что концепция государственного суверенитета действительно является важнейшим свойством любого государства и практически не зависит от влияния внешних факторов, т. е. суверенитет государства не может быть ограничен, так как это противоречит, прежде всего, его сущности, а принижение, призывы к отмене государственного суверенитета – опаснейшая тенденция, значительно повышающая уровень напряженности в мире. Государственный суверенитет – это символ, идейная основа мирового порядка и существования любого государства.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>state independence</kwd><kwd>state supremacy</kwd><kwd>sovereignty</kwd><kwd>state sovereignty</kwd><kwd>state sovereignty concept</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>независимость государства</kwd><kwd>верховенство государства</kwd><kwd>суверенитет</kwd><kwd>государственный суверенитет</kwd><kwd>концепция государственного суверенитета</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhukovskaya N.Yu., Kalinina E.V. State sovereignty and dialectics of its evolution in the modern context. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International law and international organizations, 2021, no. 4, pp. 76–88. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0633.2021.4.37115.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Жуковская Н.Ю., Калинина Е.В. Государственный суверенитет и диалектика его эволюции в современных условиях // Международное право и международные организации / International law and international organizations. 2021. № 4. С. 76–88. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0633.2021.4.37115.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Alekseeva L.A., Mayorova S.A. On the issue of state sovereignty in the context of globalization. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii, 2022, no. 3, pp. 39–44. DOI: 10.36511/2078-5356-2022-3-39-44.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Алексеева Л.А., Майорова С.А. К вопросу о государственном суверенитете в условиях глобализации // Юридическая наука и практика: Вестник Нижегородской академии МВД России. 2022. № 3. С. 39–44. DOI: 10.36511/2078-5356-2022-3-39-44.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vinogradova E.V., Polyakova T.A. On the place of information sovereignty in the constitutional legal sphere in modern Russia. Pravovoe gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika, 2021, no. 1, pp. 32–49. DOI: 10.33184/pravgos-2021.1.3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Виноградова Е.В., Полякова Т.А. О месте информационного суверенитета в конституционно-правовом пространстве современной России // Правовое государство: теория и практика. 2021. № 1. С. 32–49. DOI: 10.33184/pravgos-2021.1.3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Efremov A.A. State sovereignty in the conditions of digital transformation. Pravovedenie, 2019, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 47–61. DOI: 10.21638/spbu25.2019.103.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ефремов А.А. Государственный суверенитет в условиях цифровой трансформации // Правоведение. 2019. Т. 63. № 1. С. 47–61. DOI: 10.21638/spbu25.2019.103.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mamedov V.R. The impact of technological progress on the transformation of the essence of state sovereignty. Innovatsii i investitsii, 2021, no. 8, pp. 21–25. EDN: XBSSFF.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мамедов В.Р. Влияние технологического прогресса на трансформацию сущности государственного суверенитета // Инновации и инвестиции. 2021. № 8. С. 21–25. EDN: XBSSFF.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dvoretskiy V.M. State sovereignty as a legal category in the context of the crisis of the modern system of international relations. Pravo i politika, 2019, no. 1, pp. 11–19. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2019.1.28700.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дворецкий В.М. Государственный суверенитет как правовая категория в контексте кризиса современной системы международных отношений // Право и политика. 2019. № 1. С. 11–19. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2019.1.28700.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Murtuzaliev R.R., Alieva M.N. The problem of state sovereignty in international law. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i kadry, 2022, no. 2, pp. 247–249. DOI: 10.24412/2312-0444-2022-2-247-249.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Муртузалиев Р.Р., Алиева М.Н. Проблема государственного суверенитета в международном праве // Государственная служба и кадры. 2022. № 2. С. 247–249. DOI: 10.24412/2312-0444-2022-2-247-249.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Katkov A.D. State sovereignty: problem of its interpretation and historical evolution of the principle. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2019, no. 3, pp. 1–14. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0641.2019.3.29403.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Катков А.Д. Суверенитет государства: проблема его понимания и историческое развитие принципа // Международные отношения. 2019. № 3. С. 1–14. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0641.2019.3.29403.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ponomareva E.G., Rudov G.A. Printsip domino: mirovaya politika na rubezhe vekov [Domino effect: World policy on crossroad of ages]. Moscow, Kanon Publ., 2016. 312 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пономарева Е.Г., Рудов Г.А. Принцип домино: мировая политика на рубеже веков. М.: Канон, 2016. 312 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Leksin I.V. Sovereignty and the state: conceptual interconnections and divergences. Rossiyskoe pravo: obrazovanie, praktika, nauka, 2018, no. 3, pp. 17–29. EDN: XZTEFF.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лексин И.В. Суверенитет и государство: концептуальные взаимосвязи и расхождения // Российское право: образование, практика, наука. 2018. № 3. С. 17–29. EDN: XZTEFF.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Snyman-Ferreira M.P. The evolution of state sovereignty: A historical overview. Fundamina, 2006, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–28.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Snyman-Ferreira M.P. The evolution of state sovereignty: A historical overview // Fundamina. 2006. Vol. 12. № 2. P. 1–28.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Anghel I.-M. Subiectele de drept international. The subjects of international law. Bucharest, Lumina Lex Publishing House Publ., 1998, pp. 153–158.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Anghel I.-M. Subiectele de drept international // The subjects of international law. Bucharest: Lumina Lex Publishing House, 1998. P. 153–158.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vrabie G. Drept constitutional f institute politice contemporane. Constitutional law and contemporary political institutions. Iasi, TEAM Publ., 1995, pp. 245–249.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vrabie G. Drept constitutional f institute politice contemporane // Constitutional law and contemporary political institutions. Iasi: TEAM, 1995. P. 245–249.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Weber C. Simulating sovereignty: intervention, the state and symbolic exchange. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 1995. 164 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Weber C. Simulating sovereignty: intervention, the state and symbolic exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. 164 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ulum M.B. Sovereignty and legal personality: A lesson from European Union's evolution to supranationalism. Lampung Journal of International Law, 2022, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 27–40. DOI: 10.25041/lajil.v4i1.2517.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ulum M.B. Sovereignty and legal personality: A lesson from European Union's evolution to supranationalism // Lampung Journal of International Law. 2022. Vol. 4. № 1. P. 27–40. DOI: 10.25041/lajil.v4i1.2517.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Parasram А. Sovereignty. Showing Theory to Know Theory Understanding Social Science Concepts through Illustrative Vignettes. Ottawa, Showing Theory Press Publ., 2022. Vol. 1, pp. 453–462.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Parasram А. Sovereignty // Showing Theory to Know Theory Understanding Social Science Concepts through Illustrative Vignettes. Vol. 1. Ottawa: Showing Theory Press, 2022. P. 453–462.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Volk Ch. The Problem of Sovereignty in Globalized Times. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 2022, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 716–738. DOI: 10.1177/1743872119828010.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Volk Ch. The Problem of Sovereignty in Globalized Times // Law, Culture and the Humanities. 2022. Vol. 18. № 3. P. 716–738. DOI: 10.1177/1743872119828010.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krasner S.D. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, Princeton University Press Publ., 1999. 248 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Krasner S.D. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999. 248 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fowler M.R., Bunck J.M. Law, Power, and the Sovereign State. The Evolution and Application of the Concept of Sovereignty. Philadelphia, Penn State University Press Publ., 1995. 214 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fowler M.R., Bunck J.M. Law, Power, and the Sovereign State. The Evolution and Application of the Concept of Sovereignty. Philadelphia: Penn State University Press, 1995. 214 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schermers H. Different Aspects of Sovereignty. State, sovereignty, and international governance. Oxford, Oxford University Press Publ., 2002, pp. 185–192.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schermers H. Different Aspects of Sovereignty // State, sovereignty, and international governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. P. 185–192.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">O’Sullivan D. ‘We Are All Here to Stay’: Citizenship, Sovereignty and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Canberra, ANU Press Publ., 2020. 250 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">O’Sullivan D. ‘We Are All Here to Stay’: Citizenship, Sovereignty and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Canberra: ANU Press, 2020. 250 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Naylor R.S., Hunt C.A. Tourism and Livelihood Sovereignty: A Theoretical Introduction and Research Agenda for Arctic Contexts. Societies, 2021, vol. 11, no. 3, article number 105. DOI: 10.3390/soc11030105.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Naylor R.S., Hunt C.A. Tourism and Livelihood Sovereignty: A Theoretical Introduction and Research Agenda for Arctic Contexts // Societies. 2021. Vol. 11. № 3. Article number 105. DOI: 10.3390/soc11030105.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ilin I.M. Sovereignty in the doctrine of constitutionalism: definition, problems. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V.N. Tatishcheva, 2020, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 96–106. EDN: SRWDYK.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ильин И.М. Суверенитет в доктрине конституционализма: дефиниция, проблематика // Вестник Волжского университета им. В.Н. Татищева. 2020. Т. 1. № 2. С. 96–106. EDN: SRWDYK.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kurilkina O.A. Institute of sovereignty: theoretical and practical understanding. Filosofiya prava, 2020, no. 4, pp. 12–15. EDN: ZCDAND.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Курилкина О.А. Институт суверенитета: теоретико-правовое и практическое осмысление // Философия права. 2020. № 4. С. 12–15. EDN: ZCDAND.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
