SPLIT OF BUSINESS AS ONE OF THE WAYS OF OBTAINING UNJUSTIFIED TAX BENEFIT BY TAXPAYERS


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The paper deals with the consideration of one of the main ways of obtaining an unjustified tax benefit by taxpayers – the split of business. The issue under consideration is not fully developed in the current tax legislation. To develop the concept of “split of business”, the author gives the assessment to the law-enforcement and law expository precedents taking into account the new legislative approaches in tax practice.      

The research paper analyzes the methodological recommendations of the Investigation Committee of the Russian Federation and Federal Tax Service of the Russian Federation, which is aimed at the study and the proof of facts of intended nonpayment or underpayment of sums of taxes and charges. The author considers the main directions of identification by the taxation authorities of obtaining tax payment savings by taxpayers with the help of the creation of the “artificial” situation – split of business.      

Special attention is paid to the review of legal practice on the proof of facts of obtaining an unjustified tax benefit by taxpayers.

The author systematizes and considers the plan of actions of legal entities which allow the controlling authorities representatives to build an evidence base indicating that the dividing of an organization into several other legal entities is just an artificially developed scheme – “split of business”.     

The results of the study can be used in the theoretical research covering the analysis of content and essence of the rights and responsibilities of taxpayers and for the development of tax policy of legal entities and individual entrepreneurs.

The work carried out allows identifying the main problems in the sphere of application of schemes with the business processes separation by taxpayers and suggesting the variants of their solution.

About the authors

Valentina Aleksandrovna Ostroukhova

Togliatti State University, Togliatti

Author for correspondence.
Email: ostrouxova85@list.ru

Senior lecturer of Chair “Constitutional and Administrative Law” of the Institute of Law, Class 3 Advisor of the State Civil Service of the RF

Russian Federation

References

  1. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2018 [The Constitution of the Russian Federation. 2018]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2018. 31 p.
  2. Nalogovyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Chast pervaya [Tax Code of the Russian Federation. Part one]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2018. 414 p.
  3. The Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation dated the 12th of October 2006 No. 53 “Concerning the assessment by the arbitration courts of justification of obtaining tax benefit by a taxpayer”. Konsultant-Plyus: spravochno-pravovaya sistema. URL: consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_63894/.
  4. Order of the Federal Tax Service of Russia of 08.05.2015 N MMV-7-2/189. Konsultant-Plyus: spravochno-pravovaya sistema. URL: consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_180453/.
  5. Letter of the Federal Tax Service of Russia of 17.07.2013 N AS-4-2/12837. Konsultant-Plyus: spravochno-pravovaya sistema. URL: consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_150126/.
  6. Letter of the Federal Tax Service of Russia of August 11, 2017 N CA-4-7/15895. Konsultant-Plyus: spravochno-pravovaya sistema. URL: consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_256250/.
  7. Letter of the Federal Tax Service of Russia of 13.07.2017 N ED-4-2/13650. Konsultant-Plyus: spravochno-pravovaya sistema. URL: consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_220597/.
  8. Arbitrazhnyy protsessualnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii: tekst s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami na 21 yanvarya 2018 goda [Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation: as amended and supplemented as of the 21st of January 2018]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2018. 189 p.
  9. Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: po sostoyaniyu na 1 marta 2018 goda [Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses: as of the 1st of March 2018]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2018. 636 p.
  10. Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii: postateynyy kommentariy [The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: paragraph-to-paragraph commentary]. Izd. 7th, pererab. i dop. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2018. 736 p.
  11. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Civil Code of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2018. Ch. 1, 831 p.
  12. Kolesnikova E.N. The danger of tax optimization in the form of split of business. Finansovyy vestnik: finansy, nalogi, strakhovanie, bukhgalterskiy uchet, 2018, no. 1, pp. 32–36.
  13. The news of judicial practice in the sphere of taxes, charges, insurance payment of the Russian Federation. Finansovye i bukhgalterskie konsultatsii, 2018, no. 3, pp. 17–20.
  14. RF Government Decree dated the 30th of September 2004 No. 506 “About the approval of Regulations on Federal Tax Service” (ed. dated the 23rd of September 2017). Konsultant-Plyus: spravochno-pravovaya sistema. URL: consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_49673/.
  15. The Order of the RF Procurator General dated the 13th of July 2017 No. 486 “About the approval of Policy and procedure of recording, keeping and transfer of material evidence for criminal cases in the prosecution authorities of the Russian Federation”. Konsultant-Plyus: spravochno-pravovaya sistema. URL: consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_281338/.
  16. The Order of the RF Procurator General dated the 7th of June 2006 No.29 “About the Approval of Temporary policy and procedure of recording, keeping and transfer of material evidence, things of value and other property for criminal cases in the prosecution authorities of the Russian Federation”. Konsultant-Plyus: spravochno-pravovaya sistema. URL: consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_84320/.
  17. Ostroukhova V.A., Kostin A.V. Seizure of documents and things as the tax control measures. Tatishchevskie chteniya: aktualnye problemy nauki i praktiki: sbornik materialov XV Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Tolyatti, VUiT Publ., 2018. Vol. 3, pp. 98–105.
  18. Blokhina N.A., Ostroukhova V.A. The main approaches to assessing the unreasonable tax benefit received by taxpayers. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V.N. Tatishcheva, 2018, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 40–47.
  19. Consultant-Plus: reference and legal system. URL: consultant.ru.
  20. Federal Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation: official website. URL: arbitr.ru.
  21. Federal Tax Service: official website. URL: nalog.ru.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies