THE METHODOLOGY OF PUBLIC DOCUMENTATION


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The paper considers the issues of methodological support of the procedure of public documenting. The author defines public documenting as the procedure for collecting and recording of the information about an event that caused the public interest. The public commission is called an entity of public documenting. The result of this procedure is based on the application of special knowledge and thus matches the criteria of judicial procedure. The result can be used as well to justify the legislative decisions taken by the state authorities. The methodological basis of public documenting consists of special methods of study. They are used by specialists who have an interest in the public entity. Knowledge learned through special research meets the scientific criterion. The author considered the content and structure of special cognition acquired during public documenting and defined the method of public documenting as the system of principles and techniques using which the objective knowledge of an event is achieved. The role of research technology in the procedure is highlighted. Scientific nature of special knowledge provides the objectivity of the results of public documenting. The materials of public documenting meet the criteria applicable to the judicial evidence. The applicability of case-method to the methodology of public documenting is defined. The author identifies the features of an object and the entity of specified methods, shows the specificity of public documenting, and substantiates the scientific nature and objectivity of public documenting. The paper considers the example of public documenting of the events with the attributes of military crimes and the extremist acts on the territory of a self-identified state. The author demonstrates the objectivity and reliability of its result. During the documenting procedure, wide special knowledge is applied to study various types of traces of the crime. The author concretizes the methodology of such research and notes that the experts of forensic institutions carried out special research. Due to the scientific nature, the results of public documenting can be taken as the judicial evidence.

About the authors

Sergey Nikolaevich Shestov

Academy of Labour and Social Relations, Sevastopol

Author for correspondence.
Email: shestoff.sergej@yandex.ru

PhD (Economic), Associate Professor, Director Institute of Economics and Law

Russian Federation

References

  1. Shestov S.N. Public documenting as the method in the system of state management. Pravo. Pravovoe obespechenie deyatelnosti organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti i mestnogo samoupravleniya v sovremennykh usloviyakh: sbornik nauchnykh rabot serii. Donetsk, DonAUiGS Publ., 2017. Vyp. 4, pp. 171–185.
  2. Moiseev A.M., Zhigulin A.M. The exptra-procedural subject of proving in the international criminal trial. Izvestiya Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, 2016, no. 1-2, pp. 74–79.
  3. Moiseev A.M., Zhigulin A.M. Documenting of the military crimes: the interaction of its subjects with the international judicial instances. Pravoporyadok: istoriya, teoriya, praktika, 2016, no. 2, pp. 31–37.
  4. Moiseev A.M., Shestov S.N. The public subject of legal responsibility under the conditions of the unrecognized state. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki, 2017, no. 4, pp. 49–52.
  5. Moiseev A.M. Public documenting in criminal procedure. Ugolovnoe proizvodstvo: protsessualnaya teoriya i kriminalisticheskaya praktika: materialy VI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Simferopol, ARIAL Publ., 2018, pp. 80–82.
  6. Kuznetsov S.A., ed. Bolshoy tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka [Big explanatory dictionary of Russian language]. Sankt Petersburg, Norint Publ., 2000. 1536 p.
  7. Turchenko M.S., Zavadskaya M.A. Casual Mechanism vs Pile of Facts: How to Evaluate Casual Links in Case Study Research. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 2017, no. 2, pp. 134–146.
  8. Sokol V.Yu. Krizis otechestvennoy kriminalistiki [The Crisis of Forensic Science in Russia]. Krasnodar, KrU MVD Rossii Publ., 2017. 332 p.
  9. Kozhevnikova I.I. Experimental method in psychology. Fundamentalnye i prikladnye nauchnye issledovaniya: vzglyady molodykh uchenykh: sbornik statey po materialam Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsiya. Makeevka, MEGI Publ., 2014, pp. 58–64.
  10. Surmin Yu.P., ed. Situatsionnyy analiz, ili anatomiya Keys-metoda [Situational analysis, or Anatomy of case-method]. Kiev, Tsentr innovatsiy i razvitiya Publ., 2002. 286 p.
  11. Surmin Yu.P. Keys-method: becoming and development is in Ukraine. Vіsnik NADU, 2015, no. 2, pp. 19–28.
  12. Flivberg B. On misunderstandings in connection with case-studies. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2005, no. 4, pp. 110–120.
  13. Gotlib A.S. Kachestvennoe sotsiologicheskoe issledovanie: poznavatelnye i ekzistentsialnye gorizonty [Qualitative sociological study: cognitive and existential horizons]. Moscow, Flinta Publ., 2014. 354 p.
  14. Moїsєєv O.M., Sednєv V.V., Bordyugov L.G., Skrinnіkova N.S. Katastrofi: teoretichnі ta prikladnі aspekti rozslіduvannya [Catastrophes: theoretical and applied aspects of investigation]. Donetsk, Noulidzh (Donetskoe otdelenie) Publ., 2014. 198 p.
  15. Moiseev A.M., Shestov S.N. The public documentation: aspect of representee. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki, 2017, no. 7, pp. 27–30.
  16. Moiseev A.M., Panko N.A., Shestov S.N. Spetsialnye issledovaniya v dokumentirovanii obshchestvennykh sobytiy [Special research in documenting of public events].Saarbrücken, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publ., 2017. 269 p.
  17. Demidov A.B. Filosofiya i metodologiya nauki: kurs lektsiy [Philosophy and methodology of science: series of lectures]. Vitebsk, VGU im. P.M. Masherova Publ., 2006. 102 p.
  18. Panko N.A. Special research in legal expertise. Voprosy kriminologii, kriminalistiki i sudebnoy ekspertizy: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Minsk, Pravo i ekonomika Publ., 2015. Vyp. 2/38, pp. 81–87.
  19. Zhigulin A.M., Moiseev A.M. Dokumentirovanie voennykh prestupleniy v usloviyakh vooruzhennogo konflikta [Documenting of military crimes in the conditions of an armed conflict]. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2016. 208 p.
  20. Malyugin V.A. The deficiency of public control as the corruption element of the queuing system. Dni nauki – 2017: sbornik nauchnykh trudov po rezultatam XXIII Nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii studentov, aspirantov i molodykh uchenykh. Makeevka, MEGI Publ., 2017. Vol. 6, pp. 175–178.
  21. Artemova D.I. Experts and professionals as participants in the process of proving the constitutional and criminal proceedings. Nauchno-metodicheskiy elektronnyy zhurnal Kontsept, 2014, no. S27, pp. 1–5.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies