CONCERNING THE ISSUE OF PROCEDURAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EVIDENTIARY INFORMATION ACQUIRED FROM THE INTERNET SOURCES


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This paper considers the significant issue of a criminal procedure – the attachment of the evidential significance of the information acquired from the information resources. The authors show that the current national criminal procedure legislation does not regulate special aspects of the introduction of such information to the evidentiary base. The thesis is substantiated that the lack of appropriate procedural regulation adversely affects the legality of proof when investigating and considering criminal cases, the reliability, and credibility of the acquired evidence. Whereby, it is stated that the needs of the law enforcement practice insistently require the filling of the current legislative gap as the other creates the risk of admission of the acquired evidence as incompetent and, as a consequence, the termination of a criminal prosecution or the entry of a judgment of acquittal. The authors draw attention that the similar procedures are known already and work successfully in other areas of Russian law, for example, in respect to the perpetuation of evidence by the notary officers. In this connection, the authors substantiate the suggestions about the introduction of additions to the Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure aimed at the introduction of a new type of survey, more specifically, a survey of the information objects of the Internet network and communication network channels. The authors substantiate as well the key distinctions of the proposed investigative activities from a standard survey of items and documents, which are mainly in the content of a protocol of inspection of the information resources, and consider the problem of provision of personal information about a network user by an organization rendering the Internet access services to an investigator (interviewer). Based on the analysis of current investigation practice, the conclusion is made about its contradiction to the constitutional guarantees for personal privacy established by the article 23 of the Russian Federation Constitution. Reasoning from this fact, the authors suggest protecting by law the possibility of requesting such information only on the basis of a judicial decision obtained under the procedure of the article 165 of the Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure.

About the authors

Stanislav Viktorovich Yunoshev

Togliatti State University, Togliatti

Author for correspondence.
Email: svyunoshev@gmail.com

PhD (Law), Associate Professor, Head of Chair “Criminal Law and Procedure”

Russian Federation

Sergey Viktorovich Kondratyuk

Togliatti State University, Togliatti

Email: kondratyuk.serzh@mail.ru

lecturer of Chair “Criminal Law and Procedure”

Russian Federation

References

  1. Petrukhin I.L. Teoreticheskie osnovy reformy ugolovnogo protsessa v Rossii [Theoretical foundations of the reform of the criminal process in Russia]. Moscow, TK Velbi Publ., 2004. 224 p.
  2. Sheyfer S.A. Sobiranie dokazatelstv po ugolovnomu delu: problemy zakonodatelstva, teorii i praktiki [Collection of evidence on a criminal case: the problems of legislation, theory, and practice]. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2015. 112 p.
  3. Sheyfer S.A. Dokazatelstva i dokazyvanie po ugolovnym delam: problemy teorii i pravovogo regulirovaniya [Evidence and proof in criminal cases: problems of theory and legal regulation]. Moscow, NORMA-INFRA-M Publ., 2012. 240 p.
  4. Lazareva V.A. Dokazyvanie v ugolovnom protsesse [Proving in criminal proceedings]. 5th izd., pererab. i dop. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2014. 359 p.
  5. Belkin A.R. Teoriya dokazyvaniya [Theory of proof]. Moscow, NORMA Publ., 1999. 429 p.
  6. Borisevich G.Ya. Documents as proofs in the Russian criminal procedure. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki, 2012, no. 1, pp. 202–216.
  7. Lokk R.G.-V. Vindication of written documents and other data carriers at the stage of initiation of a criminal case. Aktualnye problemy borby s prestupnostyu. Saratov, SYuI MVD Rossii Publ., 2007, pp. 113–126.
  8. Sazonova T.P. Vindication of items and documents as a manner of collecting evidences. Vestnik Yuzhno-Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo, 2009, no. 19, pp. 48–51.
  9. Lazareva V.A., Tarasova A.A., eds. Ugolovno-protsessualnoe pravo. Aktualnye problemy teorii i praktiki [Criminal Procedural Law. Important Issues of Theory and Practice]. 3rd izd., pererab. i dop. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2016. 465 p.
  10. Nekrasov S.V. Yuridicheskaya sila dokazatelstv v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Juridical force of evidence in criminal procedure]. Moscow, Ekzamen Publ., 2004. 128 p.
  11. Vasyaev A.A. Priznanie dokazatelstv nedopustimymi v khode sudebnogo sledstviya v sude pervoy instantsii v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse [Admission of evidence as incompetent in the course of a judicial investigation at first instance in the Russian criminal procedure]. Moscow, Volters Kluver Publ., 2010. 176 p.
  12. Lazareva V.A., ed. Ugolovnyy protsess [Criminal process]. Moscow, YuSTITsIYa Publ., 2017. 654 p.
  13. Lebedev A. Notary officers at the defense of the rights for Internet: securing of evidence by notary officers. Peterburgskiy Notarius, 2017, no. 2, pp. 3–4.
  14. Shidlovskaya Yu.V. Certain issues related to the procedure of examination of an information resource. Pravovye problemy ukrepleniya rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti: sbornik statey. Tomsk, Tom-kiy un-t Publ., 2012, pp. 137–139.
  15. Sheyfer S.A. Sledstvennye deystviya. Osnovaniya, protsessualnyy poryadok i dokazatelstvennoe znachenie [Investigative actions. Grounds, a remedial order and probative value]. Samara, Samarskiy universitet Publ., 2004. 228 p.
  16. Rossinskiy S.B. Sledstvennye deystviya [Investigative actions]. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2018. 240 p.
  17. Olinder N.V. Typical ways of commission of crimes related to the using electronic payment means and systems. Ekspert-kriminalist, 2014, no. 1, pp. 13–15.
  18. Bagmet A.M., ed. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po rassledovaniyu prestupleniy protiv polovoy neprikosnovennosti nesovershennoletnikh, sovershennykh posredstvom globalnoy seti “Internet” [Methodological recommendations for investigation of crimes against the sexual inviolability of minors committed through the global Internet network]. Moscow, Akademiya Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossiyskoy Federatsii Publ., 2016. 73 p.
  19. Stelmakh V.Yu. Obtaining Information about Connections between Subscribers and/or Subscriber Devices. Lex Russica, 2017, no. 3, pp. 141–153.
  20. Gontar S.N., Uvarov N.A. The development of the constitutional right of individuals to privacy of the person in the field of criminal justice in modern history. Vestnik Universiteta, 2014, no. 13, pp. 290–292.
  21. Aberkhaev E.R. The right on inviolability of privacy: the juridical characteristic and realization problems. Aktualnye problemy ekonomiki i prava, 2008, no. 1, pp. 90–94.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies