SOCIO-ECONOMIC VECTOR IN THE EVOLUTION OF THE POSITIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HIGHEST EXECUTIVE AUTHORITIES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

The degree of elaboration of the constitutional responsibility of senior officials is one of the most fateful for the state political and legal matters. In constitutional law, there is reason to highlight both positive and negative varieties of responsibility. For scientists and citizens a negative view of a more familiar and understandable in the context of discussions about the concept of “responsibility”. The positive version of the constitutional-legal liability still raises questions by its very “right to life”, the relevance of the existence of the “responsible” category, i. e. still requires definition in the interpretation of their understanding. The author argues that the Foundation of this type of liability has two points of support: the morality and responsibility of the authorities to society. However, it is difficult to “pack” in the rule of law such a thing as morality. As the Central problem is the liberation of assessing the behavior of the entity from political discretion, which can be quite biased in nature. Proposals that would not only assess the subject and society the starting point for the emergence of positive constitutional legal responsibility of the Supreme bodies of Executive power, and its justification. Based advised to take a second fundamental benchmark of positive responsibility – the constitutional-legal responsibility of state authorities to society. In presented article form to put it socio-economic character of constitutional and legal responsibility, and its introduction would require the active activities of the designated entities, which must be aimed at achieving positive social and economic outcomes in their work.