On the goal-setting system in the Russian criminal procedure
- Authors: Vershinin I.L.1, Kozhevnikov R.O.1
-
Affiliations:
- Togliatti State University, Togliatti
- Issue: No 4 (2023)
- Pages: 5-12
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://vektornaukipravo.ru/jour/article/view/619
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18323/2220-7457-2023-4-5-12
- ID: 619
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The paper presents a study of the problem of determining the criminal procedure goals in relation to modern Russian criminal proceedings. The authors summarized the concepts, views, and approaches to determining the goals of criminal procedure (criminal proceedings) historical types presented in criminal procedure science. The authors applied the results obtained to the current model of the Russian criminal procedure and carried out a functional analysis of procedural activities separately in pre-trial and court proceedings focusing on powers of officials carrying out criminal proceedings. When searching and formulating goals for each part of court proceedings, the authors relied on the characterization of the goal as a hypothetical form of completing the process determined by the powers of the head of the procedure and the relation of the criminal procedure with criminal law. The study shows that attempts to formulate a single goal of a criminal procedure organized according to a mixed type are initially doomed to failure due to the fundamental differences between pre-trial and court proceedings. The authors propose distinguishing in the Russian criminal procedure (criminal proceedings) not one, but several goals determined by the characteristics of separate stages of procedural activity: the goals the investigator (inquiry officer) faces during the preliminary investigation; the goals the prosecutor faces during criminal prosecution; and the justice goals ensured by the court. The proposed goal-setting system of the Russian criminal procedure is based on an objective criterion – functional differences in the procedural statuses of officials conducting criminal proceedings.
About the authors
Ivan Leonidovich Vershinin
Togliatti State University, Togliatti
Author for correspondence.
Email: iv.vershinin2015@yandex.ru
senior lecturer of Chair “Criminal Law and Procedure”
Russian FederationRodion Olegovich Kozhevnikov
Togliatti State University, Togliatti
Email: kozhevnikov.rodion@yandex.ru
postgraduate student
Russian FederationReferences
- Strogovich M.S. Materialnaya istina i sudebnye dokazatelstva v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse [Substantive truth and judicial evidence in Soviet criminal procedure]. Moscow, Akademiya Nauk SSSR Publ., 1955. 384 p.
- Elkind P.S. Tseli i sredstva ikh dostizheniya v sovetskom ugolovno-protsessualnom prave [Goals and means towards them in Soviet criminal procedure law]. Leningrad, Leningradskiy universitet Publ., 1976. 143 p.
- Mizulina E.B. Ugolovnyy protsess: kontseptsiya samoogranicheniya gosudarstva [Criminal procedure as a means of self-restraint of the state]. Tartu, Tartuskiy universitet Publ., 1991. 148 p.
- Mikhaylovskaya I.B. Tseli, funktsii i printsipy rossiyskogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (ugolovno-protsessualnaya forma) [Goals, functions and principles of Russian criminal justice (criminal procedural form)]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2003. 144 p.
- Barabash A.S. Priroda rossiyskogo ugolovnogo protsessa, tseli ugolovno-protsessualnoy deyatelnosti i ikh ustanovlenie [The nature of Russian criminal procedure, goals of criminal procedure activities and their setting]. Sankt Petersburg, Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press Publ., 2005. 257 p.
- Makarova Z.V. The purpose of criminal proceedings is the truth. Problemy prava, 2015, no. 1, pp. 144–147. EDN: TSKGJH.
- Aleksandrov A.S., Vlasova S.V. Anti-dogmatic: a new understanding of the criminal process and law. Rossiyskiy zhurnal pravovykh issledovaniy, 2019, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 53–63. EDN: SBEBEG.
- Zinatullin Z.Z. Problemy ugolovnogo protsessa Rossii: stati i retsenzii raznykh let [Problems of the criminal process in Russia: collection of articles]. Izhevsk, Detektiv-inform Publ., 2008. 283 p.
- Topchieva T.V. Dosudebnoe soglashenie o sotrudnichestve v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse [Pre-trial cooperation agreement in Russian criminal procedure]. Barnaul, BYuI MVD Rossii Publ., 2015. 130 p.
- Tsareva Yu.V., Saleeva Yu.E. Legality of implementation operational-search measures as an unconditional guarantee of achieving the goals of criminal proceedings. Vestnik Uralskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii, 2020, no. 4, pp. 56–62. EDN: ZGQWLS.
- Kolesnik V.V. Purpose of criminal proceedings in the concept of encouraging participants in criminal proceedings to cooperate with preliminary investigation bodies and the court. Altayskiy yuridicheskiy vestnik, 2021, no. 3, pp. 132–138. EDN: FLXSKY.
- Mikhaylov V.A. The concept, goals and objectives of preliminary investigation in criminal court proceedings of the Russian Federation. Trudy Akademii MVD Respubliki Tadzhikistan, 2015, no. 3, pp. 110–117. EDN: WAAANT.
- Ivanov V.I. Investigation of the purpose, goals and objectives of the criminal procedure by means of systemic approach. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava, 2021, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 142–151. doi: 10.17803/1994-1471.2021.125.4.142-151.
- Averin A.V. Justice – this is the application of the right of law, not the use of its form. Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn, 2021, no. 3, pp. 228–235. doi: 10.24412/1608-8794-2021-3-228-235.
- Lazareva V.A. The interaction of the investigator, the head of the investigative body and the prosecutor in the initiation and implementation of criminal prosecution. Pravovaya paradigma, 2021, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 41–48. doi: 10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2021.2.6.
- Rossinskiy S.B. Indictment: procedural purpose. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki, 2023, no. 3, pp. 35–41. doi: 10.18323/2220-7457-2023-3-35-41.
- Sheyfer S.A. Dosudebnoe proizvodstvo v Rossii: etapy razvitiya sledstvennoy, sudebnoy i prokurorskoy vlasti [Pre-trial proceedings in Russia: stages of development of the investigative, judicial and prosecutorial authorities]. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2019. 192 p.