Between the investigation and the court: actions and decisions of the prosecutor at the end of the investigation as the final stage of pre-trial proceedings

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The paper studies the essence and significance of the criminal-procedural activity of a prosecutor on completion of a preliminary investigation as a specific stage of pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case, which differs from the preliminary investigation in its parties, implemented tasks, specific forms of activity and legal relations, and final procedural decisions. The author analyzes the process of transformation of the indictment (charging document, accusatory decision) from a document completing the preliminary investigation and summing up its results into a document setting the limits, that is, the subject and scope of the upcoming trial. The paper considers the criminal-procedural significance of an act of approving the indictment (act, resolution) by the prosecutor. As a result of the study, the author formulates and substantiates conclusions on the end of pre-trial proceedings, as an independent, third in pre-trial proceedings, stage of the criminal process, which has its own boundaries (beginning and completion), specific goals and objectives, a responsible actor, and a special final procedural decision of multi-aspect significance. The prosecutor’s approval of an indictment (act, resolution) means: a) the prosecutor’s agreement with the preliminary investigation results; b) the end of pre-trial proceedings; c) the criminal case transition to the next stage – the judicial stage of the criminal procedure; d) the transfer of the burden of proof from a subject (body) of the preliminary investigation to the prosecutor heading the prosecutorial jurisdiction; e) the emergence of a state prosecution as a criminal-legal claim of the state against an accused. The paper contains the proposals, which determine the prospects for further improvement of the criminal-procedural law and increasing the efficiency of criminal-procedural activities by more clearly delineating responsibility for the results achieved between the preliminary investigation bodies and the prosecutor.

About the authors

Valentina Aleksandrovna Lazareva

Academician S.P. Korolev Samara National Research University, Samara

Author for correspondence.
Email: v.a.lazareva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2725-9517

Doctor of Sciences (Law), Professor

Russian Federation

References

  1. Rossinskiy S.B. Indictment: procedural purpose. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki, 2023, no. 3, pp. 35–41. doi: 10.18323/2220-7457-2023-3-35-41.
  2. Savelev K.A. Obespechenie prava obvinyaemogo na zashchitu pri okonchanii predvaritelnogo sledstviya [Ensuring the right of the accused to defense at the end of the preliminary investigation]. Samara, Samarskiy universitet Publ., 2008. 182 p.
  3. Kuznetsova E.V. About the prosecutor’s supervision and departmental control at the final stage of the preliminary investigation. Vestnik Uralskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii, 2023, no. 1, pp. 11–16. EDN: WKDXRH.
  4. Cheltsov M.A. Sovetskiy ugolovnyy protsess [Soviet criminal trial]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo yuridicheskoy literatury Publ., 1951. 490 p.
  5. Savitskiy V.M. Prokurorskiy nadzor za doznaniem i predvaritelnym sledstviem [Prosecutor’s supervision of inquiry and preliminary investigation]. Moscow, Gosyurizdat Publ., 1959. 262 p.
  6. Alekseev N.S., Lukashevich V.Z., eds. Ugolovnyy protsess [Criminal process]. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ., 1971. 584 p.
  7. Petrukhin I.L. Teoreticheskie osnovy reformy ugolovnogo protsessa v Rossii [Theoretical foundations of the reform of the criminal process in Russia]. Moscow, TK Velbi Publ., 2005. 92 p.
  8. Efimichev S., Efimichev P. Completion of the preliminary investigation with the preparation of the indictment. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2006, no. 1, pp. 83–87. EDN: KXKPEH.
  9. Balakshina V.S., Kozubenko Yu.V., Proshlyakova A.D., eds. Ugolovnyy protsess [Criminal procedure]. Moscow, Infotropik Media Publ., 2016. 912 p.
  10. Rossinskiy S.B. Dosudebnoe proizvodstvo po ugolovnomu delu: sushchnost i sposoby sobiraniya dokazatelstv [Pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case: the essence and methods of collecting evidence]. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2021. 408 p.
  11. Kovaleva E.A. Problems of legal regulation of the stage of approval of the indictment by the prosecutor. Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava, 2022, vol. 12, no. 3A, pp. 180–185. EDN: UXPVON.
  12. Kovtun N.N. Formation of public prosecution as an independent stage of criminal proceedings in Russia. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2019, no. 9, pp. 123–137. doi: 10.12737/jrl.2019.9.10.
  13. Popov V.S. Pre-trial criminal proceeding: the restoration of the triad of its stages. Problemy prava, 2012, no. 4, pp. 188–194. EDN: PEWEAT.
  14. Spirin A.V. On the prospects for improving the stage of completion of the preliminary investigation and the powers of the prosecutor. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika, 2021, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 70–78. doi: 10.25205/2542-0410-2021-17-2-70-78.
  15. Rezyapov A.A. End of preliminary investigation in the system of pre-judicial production of criminal cases. Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, 2013, no. 12, pp. 162–164. EDN: RRRDKF.
  16. Manova N.S., Frantsiforov Yu.V. The procedural nature of the prosecutor’s activities at the end of pre-trial proceedings. Rossiyskiy sledovatel, 2003, no. 8, pp. 35–37. EDN: OPBGJT.
  17. Strogovich M.S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa [Course of Soviet criminal procedure]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1970. Vol. 2, 516 p.
  18. Gavrilov B.Ya. Modern problems of pre-judicial production and measure for their permission. Rossiyskiy sledovatel, 2013, no. 21, pp. 5–11. EDN: RFLUWJ.
  19. Shadrin V.S. Powers and activities of the prosecutor on the order of the state prosecution. Kriminalist, 2020, no. 2, pp. 82–88. EDN: VBIRRC.
  20. Yakimovich Yu.K., Pan T.D. Sudebnoe proizvodstvo po UPK Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Judicial proceedings under the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation]. Sank Petersburg, Izdatelstvo R. Aslanova “Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press” Publ., 2005. 252 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2023 Lazareva V.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies