Punishment and the concept of restorative justice in criminal law
- Authors: Antonchenko V.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Far-Eastern Fire and Rescue Academy – Branch of Saint-Petersburg University of State Fire Service of EMERCOM of Russia
- Issue: No 2 (2024)
- Pages: 11-18
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://vektornaukipravo.ru/jour/article/view/640
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18323/3034-2945-2024-2-11-18
- ID: 640
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The relevance of the study is caused by the necessity for further increment of scientific knowledge on the issues of fighting crime by means of criminal law, as well as by the importance of understanding the essence of criminal punishment, which has a complex and contradictory nature manifested in the deprivation or restriction of the rights and freedoms of a person found guilty of committing a crime. The purpose of the work is to search for the most rational properties of punishment that can have a positive impact on quantitative and qualitative indicators of criminality. Causing adverse consequences to an offender is based on the practice of revenge, which has historically developed throughout the existence of human civilization, based on the irrational properties of the emotional sphere of a person. These properties of punishment inevitably penetrate beyond the penitentiary sphere and affect the entire society. Today, domestic criminal policy does not help reduce crime; on the contrary, by increasing the number of crimes and convicted for them (through the criminalization of acts) and worsening the quality indicators of criminality (through the widespread use of imprisonment contributing to the society dehumanization and the criminal sphere professionalization), it complicates the criminal situation. The humanization of “prison” relations could become a significant factor in the general preventive impact on criminality. The author believes that the efforts of the law enforcement system of the state should not be aimed at revenge, even if it receives ennobled connotations in the terms “retaliation”, “retribution”, but at compensating for the harm caused by the crime and at isolating an individual who, by virtue of the committed act, brings a public danger. This approach is inevitably associated with the humanization of criminal legal relations and the rationalization of punishment, which are necessary for society no less than for individuals punished for committing crimes.
About the authors
Vadim Viktorovich Antonchenko
Far-Eastern Fire and Rescue Academy – Branch of Saint-Petersburg University of State Fire Service of EMERCOM of Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: dvpsa@igps.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0319-562X
PhD (Law), Associate Professor, assistant professor of Chair of Humanities and Social and Economic Disciplines
Russian Federation, 690922, Russia, Vladivostok, Russkiy Island, Ayaks settlement, 27References
- Avanesov G.A. Sotsialnye obrazovaniya i prestupnost: kriminologicheskie rassuzhdeniya i zametki [Social formations and criminality: criminological reasoning and notes]. Moscow, YuNITI Publ., 2011. 239 p.
- Borodin S.V. Otvetstvennost za ubiystvo: kvalifikatsiya i nakazanie po rossiyskomu pravu [Responsibility for murder: qualification and punishment by Russian law]. Moscow, Yurist Publ., 1994. 216 p.
- Golik Yu.V. Crime and punishment: what lies ahead? Kriminologiya vchera, segodnya, zavtra, 2016, no. 4, pp. 61–63. EDN: YFZZUZ.
- Zhalinskiy A.E. Izbrannye trudy. Ugolovnoe pravo [Selected works. Criminal law]. Moscow, NIU VShE Publ., 2015. Vol. 2, 590 p.
- Korobeev A.I., Komissarov V.S., Rarog A.I. Uchenie o nakazanii v ugolovnom prave Rossii [Penalty doctrine in the Russian criminal law]. Vladivostok, Dalnevostochnyy federalnyy universitet Publ., 2011. 316 p.
- Urazbaev R.Sh. Conditional sentence: punishment or release? Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii, 2017, no. 3, pp. 91–99. EDN: ZNLGTZ.
- Gorbunova M.Yu. Emotions of the society in the context of social and economical transformation. Sotsium i vlast, 2012, no. 4, pp. 11–17. EDN: PJOZCJ.
- Lerner M.J. The Belief in a Just World A Fundamental Delusion. New York, Springer Publ., 1980. 209 p.
- Muijen M. Challenges for psychiatry: delivering the Mental Health Declaration for Europe. World Psychiatry, 2006, no. 2, pp. 113–117.
- Fedotova I.N. The camp economy in the USSR: on historiography of forced labor efficiency. Istoriko-ekonomicheskie issledovaniya, 2020, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 555–576. doi: 10.17150/2308-2488.2020.21(4).555-576.
- Zhalinskiy A.E. Ugolovnoe pravo v ozhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumentalnyy analiz [Criminal law in expectation of changes: theoretic-instrumental analysis]. Izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2016. 400 p.
- Gilinskiy Ya.I. Kriminologiya i deviantologiya postmoderna [Criminology and deviance study of postmodernity]. Sankt Petersburg, Aleteyya Publ., 2024. 242 p.
- Vilyams F., ed. Rossiyskaya organizovannaya prestupnost: novaya ugroza? [Russian organized crime: the new threat]. Moscow, KRON-PRESS Publ., 2000. 285 p.
- Aleksandrov Yu.K. Ocherki kriminalnoy subkultury [Essays of criminal subculture]. Moscow, Prava cheloveka Publ., 2012. 152 p.
- Nenovski N. Pravo i tsennosti [Law and values]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1987. 248 p.
- Gilinskiy Ya.I. Postmodern criminology about crime and punishment. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2022, no. 4, pp. 76–84. doi: 10.31857/S013216250019611-5.
- Antonchenko V.V. Inefficiency as a basic property of the current criminal punishment. Pravovaya paradigma, 2023, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 139–146. doi: 10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2023.2.18.