On the functional delimitation of the powers of the prosecutor in criminal proceedings

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The paper studies the functional delimitation of the powers of the prosecutor in criminal proceedings, including supervision over preliminary investigation bodies, criminal prosecution (formation and maintenance of public prosecution), and defense of human rights. The problem lies in the blurring of the boundaries of these functions, insufficient legal certainty and the presence of contradictory doctrinal approaches. The author carried out an analysis of the current legislation, scientific concepts and law enforcement practice in order to identify special aspects of the division of the powers of the prosecutor. It has been found that supervision over preliminary investigation bodies is the exclusive competence of the prosecutor, which excludes the possibility of its delegation. Criminal prosecution, on the contrary, is an independent area of ​​activity, within the framework of which the prosecutor initiates prosecution, approves indictments, acts, resolutions and supports public prosecution in court. The study pays special attention to the human rights function of the prosecutor, which includes control over compliance with the constitutional rights of citizens and the protection of public interests. Based on the analysis, the author proposes amendments to Art. 37 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation aimed at eliminating legal gaps, strengthening prosecutor’s supervision and clearly delimiting its powers. The results of the study can be used to improve legislation, as well as in the development of scientific approaches to regulating the activities of the prosecutor’s office in criminal proceedings.

About the authors

Kristina A. Korchagina

Togliatti State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: kris.alexandrovna1992@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8770-1173

senior lecturer of Chair “Criminal Law and Procedure”

Russian Federation, 445020, Togliatti, Belorusskaya Street, 14

References

  1. Sinelshchikov Yu.P. On the functions of the prosecutor at the pre-trial stages of the criminal process. Rossiyskiy sledovatel, 2008, no. 17, pp. 9–14. EDN: JVXREP.
  2. Kruglikov A.P., Biryukova I.A. Procedural management of criminal prosecution by a public prosecutor on behalf of the state – a principle of criminal proceedings. Zakonnost, 2019, no. 2, pp. 38–42. EDN: SZSHRX.
  3. Anisimov G. The problems of exercise of a duty of criminal prosecution by a public prosecutor. Zakonnost, 2019, no. 9, pp. 15–18. EDN: GBYGYN.
  4. Shevchuk A.N. Correlation of the functions of criminal prosecution and prosecution in the course of pre-trial proceedings. Voennoe pravo, 2021, no. 3, pp. 229–236. EDN: FGBDJZ.
  5. Babenko S.V. On the question of the correlation of the functions of the prosecutorat the pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings. Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii, 2021, no. 3, pp. 32–36. doi: 10.51980/2542-1735_2021_3_32.
  6. Bazhanov S.V. To the question about the viability of the functions of criminal prosecution in general and prosecutorial functions of criminal prosecution in particular. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya, 2017, no. 4, pp. 52–55. EDN: YKVHHF.
  7. Ryabinina T.K. Prosecutor’s functions in the criminal proceedings: discussion continues. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo, 2007, no. 2, pp. 18–25. EDN: KWTUAX.
  8. Zhubrin R.V. Criminal prosecution as a function of the prosecutor’s office of the Russian Federation. Vestnik Universiteta prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2020, no. 2, pp. 22–25. EDN: JHMNJZ.
  9. Strelnikov V.V. Criminal prosecution by the prosecutor’s office. Ezh-Yurist, 2012, no. 1-2, pp. 3–5. EDN: WROYED.
  10. Vetskaya S.A., Mullagaleeva L.R. Individual issues of the prosecutor’s implementation of the function of criminal prosecution at the pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 2021, no. 6, pp. 60–65. doi: 10.24412/2073-0454-2021-6-60-65.
  11. Soloveva N.A., Ilyasova A.K. Prosecutor’s decision as a cause for initiating criminal proceedings: problems of improving the legislation. Pravovaya paradigma, 2019, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 131–139. doi: 10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2019.4.18.
  12. Kleshchev S.V. “The prosecutor’s” reason for initiating a criminal case: problems of implementation. Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti, 2018, no. 3, pp. 174–178. EDN: VAORMZ.
  13. Apostolova N.N. Public prosecutor’s supervision and preliminary investigation as a guarantee of the rights and freedoms of the individual. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya, 2017, no. 3, pp. 53–56. EDN: YFPXUR.
  14. Dikarev I.S. Prosecutor’s authorities in a criminal case submitted with a letter of accusation. Rossiyskiy sledovatel, 2020, no. 10, pp. 61–64. EDN: UFTHER.
  15. Varpakhovskaya E.M., Derevskova V.M. Development of prosecutor’s supervision over the procedural activities of the preliminary investigation bodies in the judicial reforms of Russia of the XIX and XX centuries. Vestnik Universiteta prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2021, no. 1, pp. 102–108. EDN: OZZBDK.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Korchagina K.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies