Equality and justice as the basis for unification of the right of citizens for an insurance labor pension


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The differentiation of the right of citizens of the Russian Federation for an insurance labor pension by gender provided for by the current legislation raises questions in civil society due to the discrepancy between the norms fixing different retirement ages for men and women, the principle of equality guaranteed by the Constitution of the Russian Federation, and ensuring social justice in society. One of the reasons is that a significant proportion of men do not live to the 65-year retirement age fixed by law. Analyzing the current legal norms and comparing them with statistical data and the results of law enforcement indicating a clearly unfair standardization of these relations, the authors offer their own vision of solving the existing problems. The authors substantiate the conclusion on the necessity to unify the right of citizens for an insurance pension by establishing a common retirement age of 60 years for men and women for the period of solving the main demographic problems in the state and creating conditions for increasing life expectancy. At the same time, emphasizing the special role of women, the authors propose to include legislatively the time associated with the birth and upbringing of children in a woman’s insurance experience, regardless of whether a woman had previous employment relationships and insurance experience. It should be done to create a favorable regime for the formation of women’s insurance experience and ensure formal equality with men.

About the authors

Roman O. Kozhevnikov

Togliatti State University

Email: rom.kojewnikoff2017@yandex.ru

student of the Institute of Law

Russian Federation, 445020, Russia, Togliatti, Belorusskaya Street, 14

Svetlana I. Vershinina

Togliatti State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: svetlana-vershinina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3501-3632

Doctor of Sciences (Law), Associate Professor, Director of the Institute of Law

Russian Federation, 445020, Russia, Togliatti, Belorusskaya Street, 14

References

  1. Azarova E.G. Early retirement benefits for insured persons with family responsibilities. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2020, no. 11, pp. 97–112. doi: 10.12737/jrl.2020.135.
  2. Zueva N.L. Legal gaps and conflicts of pension legislation. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo, 2021, no. 1, pp. 119–128. doi: 10.17308/vsu.proc.law.2021.1/3291.
  3. Shugaeva I.V. Expert opinion on the issue of raising the retirement age in Russia. Uchenye zametki TOGU, 2018, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 392–396. EDN: YYHNQT.
  4. Roshchepko N.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie sotsialno-strakhovykh otnosheniy: edinstvo publichnykh i chastnykh nachal [Legal regulation of social insurance relations: the unity of public and private principles]. Moscow, Yustitsinform Publ., 2021. 388 p.
  5. Zakharov M.L., Voronin Yu.V Sotsialnoe obespechenie: nastoyashchee i budushchee [Social security: present and future]. Moscow, NITs INFRA-M Publ., 2017. 284 p.
  6. Roik V.D. Social-labour and social-insurance methods for retirement age. EKO, 2015, no. 6, pp. 93–108. EDN: TSOAOT.
  7. Agashev D.V. Problems of establishing separate legal facts, which determine the right to an insurance old-age pension. Tomsk State University Journal of law, 2020, no. 35, pp. 141–154. doi: 10.17223/22253513/35/12.
  8. Vinokurov V.A. Reasoning about the concepts of “pension”, “state pension” and about the right of a person and a citizen to a state pension in the Russian Federation. Ekonomika. Sotsiologiya. Pravo, 2022, no. 4, pp. 94–101. EDN: RUGYDP.
  9. Mamatkazin I.R. Systems of law and functional equivalents in social security law. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 2022, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 75–98. doi: 10.35427/2073-4522-2022-17-2-mamatkazin.
  10. Merinova V.N. Types of work experience and its legal significance. Glagol pravosudiya, 2023, no. 4, pp. 29–35. EDN: AXNOOL.
  11. Zueva N.L. Legal gaps and conflicts of pension legislation. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo, 2021, no. 1, pp. 119–128. doi: 10.17308/vsu.proc.law.2021.1/3291.
  12. Dzgoeva F.O. Fairness of differentiation of pension provision for medical workers (based on judicial practice). Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), 2024, no. 2, pp. 173–183. doi: 10.17803/2311-5998.2024.114.2.173-183.
  13. Smolin O.N. The law is against everyone? Once again, on the social and economic consequences of raising the retirement age in Russia. Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii, 2019, no. 2, pp. 47–57. EDN: LCEQPJ.
  14. Vafin E.Ya. The forecast of the number of recipients of the insurance pension under the current legislation providing for an increase in the retirement age and the old legislation without raising the retirement age in the Republic of Tatarstan for the period up to 2036. Moskovskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal, 2021, no. 9, pp. 40–45. EDN: VBNLZO.
  15. Girich E.A. Raising the retirement age as one of the stages of reforming the pension system of the Russian Federation. Vlast zakona, 2022, no. 3, pp. 144–150. EDN: VDYCLZ.
  16. Zaytseva A.V., Kursova O.A., Khilchuk E.L. Validity and consequences of increasing the retirement age. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, 2019, no. 2, pp. 144–155. EDN: OPYNBA.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Vershinina S.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies