Institution of additional investigation in the legislation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus: origins and development trends


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The paper analyzes the problem of overcoming the objectively existing contradiction between the institution of returning a criminal case for additional investigation and the adversarial principle. Despite the enshrinement of the principle of adversarial proceedings and equality of parties in Art. 15 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, the initially eliminated institution of additional investigation was soon restored in its previous form. This allows the court, instead of pronouncing an acquittal, to provide the investigator with an additional possibility to continue collecting accusatory evidence. The purpose of the work is to search for alternative ways to ensure the effectiveness of criminal proceedings complying with the principles of the Russian criminal procedure, including those tested in the Republic of Belarus. In the Republic of Belarus, the technique of changing the charge to a more serious one directly during the trial and eliminating the incompleteness of the preliminary investigation by suspending the trial proceedings to collect additional evidence is used as such method. Taking into account the dynamics of legal phenomena and legal means, using methods of historical and comparative analysis, the author of the paper studies the origins of the institution of additional investigation in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus, analyzes its development, and compares the means of criminal procedural response to the errors of the preliminary investigation revealed during the trial. The study demonstrates the failure of the experience of both countries, as they have failed to free the court from its unusual duty to make up for shortcomings and eliminate errors in the preliminary investigation. The author concludes that it is necessary to search for fundamentally different means of improving the quality of the preliminary investigation directly during pre-trial proceedings.

About the authors

Elena Viktorovna Leonova

Academician S.P. Korolev Samara National Research University

Author for correspondence.
Email: 3059@paso.ru

attorney, postgraduate student

Russian Federation, 443086, Russia, Samara, Moskovskoye Shosse, 34

References

  1. Biryukov Yu.S. New criminal procedure legislation and prosecutor’s supervision practice. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya, 2003, no. 6, pp. 44–46.
  2. Ryazanov I., Gaverdovskaya V. Return of a criminal case to a prosecutor. Zakonnost, 2008, no. 12, pp. 23–24. EDN: LGOLWF.
  3. Ezhova E.V. Some problems that arise when returning a criminal case to the prosecutor. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2008, no. 3, pp. 90–95. EDN: JKFWAD.
  4. Azarov V., Baranov A., Suprun S. Return of a criminal case for additional investigation: legal awareness and legislation, interpretation and application. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2004, no. 2, pp. 84–86. EDN: LGSLBM.
  5. Trisheva A.A. Remanding a criminal case to a public prosecutor: destiny of the institute. Zakonnost, 2015, no. 4, pp. 50–55. EDN: TPHYBN.
  6. Leonova E.V. Return of supplementary investigation. Yuridicheskiy vestnik Samarskogo universiteta, 2023, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 99–105. doi: 10.18287/2542-047X-2023-9-3-99-105.
  7. Stelmakh V.Yu. Does the modern criminal procedure law provide for the return of a criminal case by a court for further investigation? Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii, 2020, no. 1, pp. 173–181. doi: 10.25724/VAMVD.NABC.
  8. Golovko L.V. Sources and the prospect for the institute of the additional investigation of criminal cases on the post-Soviet space. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2009, no. 11, pp. 54–67. EDN: LKSCSF.
  9. Sharipova A.R. Adversarial procedures in criminal, civil, arbitration and administrative proceedings: the search for unreasonable differences. Yuridicheskiy vestnik Samarskogo universiteta, 2023, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 54–59. doi: 10.18287/2542-047X-2023-9-1-54-59.
  10. Sharipova A.R. Institute for the return of a criminal case to a prosecutor by a court: intersectoral analogies. Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii, 2022, no. 3, pp. 95–103. doi: 10.25724/VAMVD.A023.
  11. Sharipova A.R. On the intersectoral analogy of law in criminal proceedings. Vestnik Instituta prava Bashkirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2021, no. 2, pp. 19–25. EDN: UATIQC.
  12. Trisheva A.A. Vozvrashchenie ugolovnogo dela prokuroru v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse [Return of a criminal case to a prosecutor in the Russian criminal procedure]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2019. 320 p.
  13. Balakshin V.S. Return of a criminal case by the court to the prosecutor to remove the obstacles of its consideration or for further investigation. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya Ekonomika i pravo, 2018, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 81–88. EDN: YVIMLJ.
  14. Zaytseva L.L. Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Belarus. Pravosudie i prokurorskiy nadzor v Respublike Belarus: zakonodatelstvo i praktika primeneniya: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Minsk, BGUFK Publ., 2010, pp. 42–68.
  15. Zaytseva L.L. On the necessity of pre-trial hearing in the criminal proceedings of the Republic of Belarus. Yustitsiya Belarusi, 2010, no. 8, pp. 39–43. EDN: KAQPIO.
  16. Gavrilov B.Ya. The limits of litigation and the court’s opportunities to change the charge: Russian and foreign experience. Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii, 2022, no. 3, pp. 83–91. doi: 10.24412/2072-9391-2022-363-83-91.
  17. Kalnitskiy V.V., Kuryakhova T.V. Amendments to article 237 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and legal evaluation of the constitutional court. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2014, no. 6, pp. 89–94. EDN: THYYUP.
  18. Sarychev D.S. Post-Soviet concept of supplementary investigation. Mirovoy sudya, 2016, no. 11, pp. 29–34. EDN: WWWGYX.
  19. Muravev K.V., Bulatov B.B. Changing the charge in court: further adjustment of the mechanism of relations between the state prosecution and the court is required. Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta MVD Rossii, 2018, no. 4, pp. 102–111. EDN: VOUOJQ.
  20. Mashovets A.O. Amendment of the charge, full or partial waiver of it by the public prosecutor in the course of the trial. Vestnik Krasnodarskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 2017, no. 2, pp. 93–96. EDN: YSRPHX.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Leonova E.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies