Criminal procedure scientific terminology: legal content and its verbal presentation
- Authors: Tarasov A.A.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Ufa University of Science and Technology
- Academician S.P. Korolev Samara National Research University
- Issue: No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 22-30
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://vektornaukipravo.ru/jour/article/view/676
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18323/3034-2945-2025-2-61-3
- ID: 676
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Criminal procedure terminology is a verbal expression of all legislative provisions, all author’s thoughts related to the interpretation of the law, discussion of law enforcement and human rights practice, it is the subject and content of all criminal procedure scientific discussions. The legal content of all criminal procedure terms is inherent in its verbal form. Both should adequately reflect the author’s thoughts, correspond to each other, be suitable for perception and correct understanding by at least a professional reading audience. The author of the paper uses specific examples from scientific works and publicly available dictionaries of the Russian language to show that for the correct expression and understanding of the author’s criminal procedure texts, both their excessive simplification by introducing professional jargon and other colloquial elements and intentional, clearly excessive complication of the author’s texts with scientific, mainly foreign-language terminology, sometimes with a distortion of its actual meaning, are equally harmful. Using deliberately complex linguistic constructions overloaded with terms that are far from the texts of laws and law enforcement practice to express the author’s criminal procedure thought is, according to the authors, usually aimed at giving their texts individuality and signs of some intellectual elitism. However, in reality this turns out to be the exact opposite – stylistic pretentiousness and verbiage, which complicate the perception of what is written by a professional reading audience and can do harm to the scientific reputation of the author.
About the authors
Aleksandr A. Tarasov
Ufa University of Science and Technology; Academician S.P. Korolev Samara National Research University
Author for correspondence.
Email: aatar@mail.ru
Doctor of Sciences (Law), Professor, Head of Chair of Criminal Law and Procedure of the Institute of Law, professor of Chair of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics of the Law Institute
Russian Federation, 450076, Ufa, Zaki Validi Street, 32; 443086, Samara, Moskovskoye Shosse, 34References
- Romashov R.A., Vetyutnev Yu.Yu., Tonkov E.N. Pravo – yazyk i masshtab svobody [Law – language and scope of freedom]. Saint-Petersburg, Aleteyya Publ., 2015. 448 p.
- Kazakova V.A., Inshakov S.M. Legal terminology editing regarding the mechanism of acquisition of legal essence by criminal law. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2020, no. 6, pp. 120–133. doi: 10.12737/jrl.2020.071.
- Savitskiy V.M. Yazyk protsessualnogo zakona (voprosy terminologii) [Language of procedural law (issues of terminology)]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1987. 288 p.
- Aleksandrov A.S. Rech – ponimanie - dokazyvanie v ugolovnom sude [Speech – understanding – proof in criminal court]. Nizhniy Novgorod, Nizhegorodskaya akademiya MVD Rossii Publ., 2003. 219 p. EDN: ATYFDL.
- Golovko L.V. We need to determine the model of the criminal process for its further development. Zakon, 2024, no. 4, pp. 8–20. EDN: GGSNJL.
- Aleksandrov A.S., Aleksandrova I.A., Kruglov I.V. Naznachenie ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva i nakazaniya [Appointment of criminal proceedings and punishment]. Nizhniy Novgorod, Nizhegorodskaya pravovaya akademiya Publ., 2006. 111 p. EDN: QXFAMD.
- Tumov V.V. Ekstraordinarnaya yurisprudentsiya v Drevnem Rime epokhi respubliki i perioda printsipata [Extraordinary jurisprudence in Ancient Rome during the republic and principate periods]. Samara, Samarskaya gumanitarnaya akademiya Publ., 2008. 168 p.
- Kistyakovskiy A.F. Obshchaya chast ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [General part of criminal proceedings]. Kiev, Izdatelstvo Semenko Sergeya Publ., 2005. 118 p.
- Kartashov V.N. Yuridicheskaya kultura, antikultura i yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost [Legal culture, anti-culture and responsibility in the legal system of society]. Yaroslavl, Filigran Publ., 2019. 352 p. EDN: FYWVSL.
- Dezhnev A.S., Muravev K.V. Referral of individual issues of a criminal case for resolution in civil proceedings. Pravovoe gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika, 2025, no. 1, pp. 41–48. doi: 10.33184/pravgos-2025.1.4.
- Solovev S.A. Professional opinion as a marker of implementation of the adversarial principle in criminal judicial proceedings. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2025, no. 5, pp. 57–69. EDN: KATCIL.
- Skoblikov P.A. Arbitrazhnyy i ugolovnyy protsessy: kollizii v sfere dokazyvaniya i puti ikh preodoleniya [Arbitration and criminal proceedings: conflicts in the sphere of evidence and ways to overcome them]. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2006. 144 p. EDN: QXBIAL.
- Skorobogatov A.V., Krasnov A.V. Law Experiment as a Legal Phenomenon. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika, 2025, no. 19, pp. 233–239. EDN: WZLTUY.
Supplementary files


