Contemporary problems of legal regulation of stray animal population
- Authors: Latypova E.Y.1, Gilmanov R.E.1, Tukhvatullina K.M.2
-
Affiliations:
- Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov (IEML)
- Nizhnekamsk branch of Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov (IEML)
- Issue: No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 7-16
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://vektornaukipravo.ru/jour/article/view/678
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18323/3034-2945-2025-3-62-1
- ID: 678
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Existing methods of controlling the stray dog population, such as sterilization and vaccination, often do not solve the problem of animal aggression. The authors propose to revise the existing law enforcement practice regarding animal cruelty, which is designed to establish a balance between protecting animals and ensuring the safety of citizens. Unfortunately, very often, aggression of stray animals in the form of stray dogs attacks on people and other domestic animals is recorded, which harms their health and can lead to death. The existing solution to the problem involves the CNVR formula (catch–neuter–vaccinate–return to the place of residence), but the problems of zooaggression are not solved in this case, which is confirmed by the constant quantitative growth of stray animals and their attacks on people. There are inaccuracies in the wording of animal cruelty in criminal and administrative legislation. Gaps in the state policy on regulating the number of stray animals, including insufficient legal regulation of responsible treatment of animals, are identified. The authors conclude that the most optimal way to regulate the number of stray animals is by means of irretrievable capture and the possibility of their euthanasia in the case of their being unwanted. The need to take into account regional characteristics when determining the period of keeping stray animals in shelters is confirmed. We believe that it is necessary to promote actively responsible treatment of animals among minors and other citizens and to create appropriate federal and regional programs in pursuance of the Federal Law “On responsible treatment of animals”.
About the authors
Elvira Yu. Latypova
Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov (IEML)
Author for correspondence.
Email: elatypova@ieml.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7390-4962
PhD (Law), Associate Professor, Head of Chair of Criminal Law and Procedure
Cameroon, 420111, Kazan, Moskovskaya Street, 42Ruslan E. Gilmanov
Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov (IEML)
Email: REGilmanov@ieml.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2062-5959
postgraduate student, lecturer of Chair of Theory and History of State and Law
Russian Federation, 420111, Kazan, Moskovskaya Street, 42Katrin M. Tukhvatullina
Nizhnekamsk branch of Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov (IEML)
Email: kidga4@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-5276-7705
department assistant at the Chair of Criminal Law and Procedure
Russian Federation, 423570, Nizhnekamsk, Prospekt Shinnikov, 44 bReferences
- Latypova E.Yu., Nechaeva E.V. Controversial issues of the content of humanism in criminal law. Bulletin of the Kazan law institute of MIA Russia, 2019, no. 3, pp. 355–360. doi: 10.24420/KUI.2019.23.36.015.
- Biryuchinskaya T.A. About raising an ethical attitude to animals. Vestnik Orenburg State University, 2020, no. 3, pp. 6–11. doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-226-6.
- Ayupova G.Sh. On the issue of interpreting particular constituent elements of cruelty to animals. Police and investigative activity, 2021, no. 4, pp. 39–52. doi: 10.25136/2409-7810.2021.4.34787.
- Karpov A.A., Nikulina O.A., Golovkin R.B. On the question of the peculiarities of criminal law regulation of responsibility for cruelty to animals. Voronezh Institute of the Russian Federal Penitentiary Service, 2021, no. 4, pp. 144–154. EDN: IFIMFB.
- Sharapov R.D. Criminal liability for animal cruelty. Legal Science and Law Enforcement Practice, 2019, no. 1, pp. 51–61. EDN: DAISBN.
- Suleymanova M.S. Analysis of foreign legislation in the field of criminal liability for cruelty to animals. Oeconomia et Jus, 2024, no. 3, pp. 77–86. doi: 10.47026/2499-9636-2024-3-77-86.
- Latypova E.Yu., Kleyn M.S., Gilmanov R.E. Anthropological approaches to the study of crime: history and current state. Oeconomia et Jus, 2024, no. 1, pp. 95–109. doi: 10.47026/2499-9636-2024-1-95-109.
- Latypova E.Yu., Kirpichnikov D.V. Criminal liability for executing works or providing services in the light of the resolution of plenum of the supreme court of the Russian Federation dated June, 25 2019 № 18 “About court practice on crimes provided by Article 238 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation”. Oeconomia et Jus, 2020, no. 2, pp. 76–88. EDN: DAISBN.
- Rusakova I.V. Influence of demographic processes on the number of homeless animals in Russian cities. St. Petersburg Sociology Today, no. 8, pp. 73–90. EDN: ZWHOAB.
- Vlasova E.L., Shabanov R.T., Veselev D.A. Legal aspects of regulation of street animals: challenges and solutions in administrative law. Nauchnyy daydzhest Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta MVD Rossii, 2025, no. 2, pp. 30–42. EDN: CRQJTN.
- Shamardin A.A. The Federal Law “About responsible the treatment of animals”: did it meet your expectations? Trudy Orenburgskogo instituta (filiala) Moskovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii, 2019, no. 39, pp. 73–80. EDN: SCWQBK.
- Yamborko A.V., Kiselev S.V. Counting the number of stray dogs in Magadan. Arctic and Subarctic Natural Resources, 2020, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 68–75. doi: 10.31242/2618-9712-2020-25-1-7.
- Balafendiev A.M., Rybushkin N.N., Garayshina G.M. Criminological aspect of the problem of responsibility of minors for animal cruelty. The Review of Economy, the Law and Sociology, 2021, no. 3, pp. 49–53. EDN: CGZGGM.
- Shabalina M.A. Legal regulation of treatment of stray animals in Russia. Law journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2022, no. 5, pp. 198–227. doi: 10.17323/2072-8166.2022.5.198.227.
- Perepelkin V.I., Kuzmin Yu.A. Interrelation of morality and legal consciousness. Oeconomia et Jus, 2019, no. 4, pp. 47–52. EDN: DELXTF.
- Zholzhaksynov Zh.B. Criminal Legal Measures or Preventing Cruel Treatment of Animals. The Bulletin of the law enforcement academy, 2020, no. 4, pp. 41–44. EDN: DCUWJM.
- Latypova E.Yu., Gilmanov E.M., Abdullina A.E., Gilmanov R.E. The influence of moral norms on the content of criminal law norms in the Criminal Code of Russia. The Review of Economy, the Law and Sociology, 2022, no. 1, pp. 93–99. EDN: TNHWSS.
- Alimov D.A. Constitutional and legal mechanism for ensuring responsible treatment of animals. Higher School Sputnik, 2023, no. 4, pp. 75–81. doi: 10.55346/27825647_2023_4_75.
- Caporale V., Alessandrini B., Dalla Villa P., Del Papa S. Global perspectives on animal welfare: Europe. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics), 2005, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 567–577.
- Tsyganova S.I. Animal protection in the council of Europe and Russia: a comparative legal analysis. Electronic supplement to Russian Juridical Journal, 2022, no. 6, pp. 58–70. doi: 10.34076/22196838_2022_6_58.
- Tasker L. Stray animal control practices: Europe. A report into the strategies for controlling stray dog and cat populations adopted in thirty-one countries. London, World Society for the Protection of Animals Publ., 2007. 54 p.
Supplementary files



