THE PROBLEMS OF APPLICATION OF A PERSONAL SURETYSHIP IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE OF RUSSIA


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This research paper covers the contemporary problems of application of a personal suretyship as a preventive measure in criminal procedure. Taking into account the preventive measures system embodied in the criminal procedure legislation, it is necessary to ensure legal, organizational and other frameworks to apply each of the existing preventive measures according to the specific situation with regard to a case. The author formulated the notion of a personal suretyship as a preventive measure and expressed the opinions about the explanation of a regulatory benchmark to which a person involved in the criminal proceedings as a guarantor should conform. The author notes the imperfection of the requirements applicable to a guarantor and embodied in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, among which there is no a requirement for arriving a certain age and ability to act. Based on the analysis of the existing points of view regarding the explanation of the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code of the RF regulating the application of a personal suretyship, the practical recommendations addressed to an executor of law are formulated. In particular, the author offers the approximate (preliminary) criteria that should be considered by a person in charge authorized to apply this preventive measure in order to form the internal conviction that a claimant for the role of a guarantor with regard to a certain criminal case will be able to make moral and psychological impact on a suspected offender (defendant) and wants to ensure his/her good behavior during the proceedings.

The author expresses an offer to make amendments to the current edition of part 1 of the article 103 of the RF Criminal Procedure Code in order to expand the practice of application of a personal suretyship as a preventive measure during the criminal proceedings.

About the authors

Aleksey Valerievich Zakomoldin

Togliatti State University, Togliatti
Samara Academy of Humanities (branch in Togliatti), Togliatti

Author for correspondence.
Email: zakomoldin@mail.ru

PhD (Law), Associate Professor, assistant professor of Chair “Criminal Law and Procedure”

Russian Federation

References

  1. Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation dated the 18th of December 2001 No.174-FZ. Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF, 2001, no. 52-I, st. 4921.
  2. Voskobitova L.A., ed. Ugolovno-protsessualnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Glavy 1-32.1. Postateynyy nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy [Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Chapters 1-32.1. Paragraph-by-paragraph scientific practical commentaries]. Moscow, Redaktsiya “Rossiyskoy gazety” Publ., 2015. Vyp. III-IV, 912 p.
  3. Bezlepkin B.T. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessualnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy) [Commentary to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (paragraph-by-paragraph)]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2012. 752 p.
  4. Lebedev V.M., ed. Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessualnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy) [Scientific practical commentary to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (paragraph-by-paragraph)]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2014. 1056 p.
  5. Enikeev Z.D. Primenenie mer presecheniya po ugolovnym delam (v stadii predvaritelnogo rassledovaniya) [The application of the preventive measures with regard to the criminal cases (at the preliminary investigation stage)]. Ufa, Bashk. un-t Publ., 1988. 84 p.
  6. Vasileva E.G. Mery ugolovno-protsessualnogo prinuzhdeniya [Measures of criminal procedure compulsion]. Ufa, BashGU Publ., 2003. 136 p.
  7. Belkin A.R. “Less severe” preventive measures in the criminal process of Russia. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo, 2012, no. 3, pp. 22–26.
  8. Criminal Procedure Code of the RSFSR: app. by the SS of the RSFSR on the 27th of October 1960. Vedomosti VS RSFSR, 1960, no. 40, st. 592. (Akt utratil silu)
  9. Medvedeva O.V. Zalog i poruchitelstvo v sisteme mer ugolovno-protsessualnogo prinuzhdeniya po zakonodatelstvu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Dis. kand. yurid. nauk [A bail and a suretyship in the system of measures of criminal procedure compulsion according to the legislation of the Russian Federation]. Volgograd, 1998. 219 p.
  10. Tkacheva N.V. Teoriya i praktika mer presecheniya, ne svyazannykh s zaklyucheniem pod strazhu. Dis. kand. yurid. nauk [Theory and practice of application of restriction measures not involving imprisonment]. Chelyabinsk, 2003. 248 p.
  11. Kapinus N.I. Protsessualnye garantii prav lichnosti pri primenenii mer presecheniya v ugolovnom protsesse [Procedural guarantees of personal rights when applying preventive measures in criminal procedure]. Moscow, Bukvoved Publ., 2007. 416 p.
  12. Balandyuk O.V. Concerning the legal status of a personal guarantor in the criminal procedure. Rossiyskiy sledovatel, 2014, no. 13, pp. 11–14.
  13. Danilova S.I. Applying, vacating and variation of a preventive measure in the form of a personal suretyship in the course of preliminary investigation. Konsultant Plyus: spravochno-pravovaya sistema. URL: consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=CJI&n=60311#043143403469196695.
  14. Sukhareva A.Ya., ed. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessualnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy) [Commentary to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (paragraph-by-paragraph)]. Moscow, NORMA Publ., 2004. 1104 p.
  15. Radchenko V.I., Tomina V.T., Polyakova M.P., eds. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessualnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy) [Commentary to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (paragraph-by-paragraph)]. Moscow, Yurayt-Izdat Publ., 2006. 1124 p.
  16. Smirnov A.V., Kalinovskiy K.B. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessualnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy) [Commentary to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (paragraph-by-paragraph)]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2009. 992 p.
  17. Chunikha A.A. Poruchitelstvo v sisteme mer protsessualnogo prinuzhdeniya. Avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk [Suretyship in the system of measures of procedural compulsion]. Stavropol, 2009. 22 p.
  18. Kasimov A.A. Preventive measures in the criminal procedure legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2012, no. 10, pp. 90–98.
  19. Petrukhin I.L., ed. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessualnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy) [Commentary to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (paragraph-by-paragraph)]. Moscow, Velbi Publ., 2008. 736 p.
  20. Mikhaylov V.A. Mery presecheniya v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse [Preventive measures in the Russian criminal procedure]. Moscow, Pravo i zakon Publ., 1996. 304 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies