ABOUT SOME SPECIAL ASPECTS OF THE PRINCIPLE OF SEPARATION OF POWERS IN RUSSIA


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The paper analyzes the principle of separation of powers as an integral feature of a modern democratic rule-of-law state regardless of the form of government. It is highlighted that this principle has its features in each state depending on its historical, religious, ethnic, and other peculiarities. The author draws attention to the fact that the principle of separation of powers, in its traditional understanding, supposing the separation of state power in the legislative, executive and judicial powers underwent modifications to a large extent. Non-traditional state authorities appeared that fit in neither of the branches of traditional state power triad, for example, the RF Central Elections Commission, Bank of Russia, Ombudsman in the RF, Presidential Executive Office, Prosecution Office, Russian Investigative Committee, etc. In the constitutional-legal science, the approach emerged, according to which the principle of separation of powers is completely applicable at the level of local self-government.

The author highlights that the principle of separation of powers does not mean their isolation but, on the contrary, supposes their active interaction. The author emphasizes the inadmissibility of interference of powers in the jurisdiction of each other. The paper draws attention to the definite contradiction of the Articles 10 and 11 of the RF Constitution. The author defends the opinion of the researchers standing for the necessity to eliminate such discrepancies. The role of the President of the Russian Federation in the system of separation of powers is considered. In particular, the author says that the President of Russia has rather large powers in relation to all traditional branches of power: legislative, executive, and judicial. Furthermore, the head of the state has the most impact on the executive power. The author analyzes the opinion of some researchers and politicians about the consideration of the Russian Federations as a presidential republic.

About the authors

Aleksey Nikolayevich Stankin

Togliatti State University, Togliatti

Author for correspondence.
Email: ans77@list.ru

PhD (Law), Associate Professor, assistant professor of Chair “Constitutional and Administrative Law”

Russian Federation

References

  1. Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen. Constitution of France: passed by the Constitutional convention on the 26th of August 1789. Velikaya frantsuzskaya revolyutsiya. URL: larevolution.ru/declaration.html.
  2. Constitution of the Kingdom of Bahrain: adopted on 02.14.2002. Konstitutsii gosudarstv (stran) mira: internet-biblioteka konstitutsiy Romana Pashkova. URL: worldconstitutions.ru/?p=79.
  3. Constitution of the Russian Federation: adopted by popular vote on 12.12.1993. Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF, 2014, no. 31, st. 4398.
  4. Yugov A.A. Unity and differentiation of public authorities: the system of separation of powers. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya, 2017, no. 9, pp. 5–8.
  5. Avakyan S.A. Political relations and constitutional regulation in modern Russia: problems and prospects. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2003, no. 11, pp. 43–54.
  6. Avakyan S.A. Separation of powers: for which levels to apply? Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii, 2018, no. 4, pp. 15–26.
  7. Taraban N.A. The constitution of the Russian federation: 20 years in Russian history. Gosudarstvennaya vlast i mestnoe samoupravlenie, 2014, no. 8, pp. 8–12.
  8. Russia can only be a presidential republic – Medvedev. RIA novosti. URL: ria.ru/politics/20081116/155232533.html.
  9. V. Putin: Russia must remain a presidential republic. RBK. URL: rbc.ru/politics/20/06/2003/5703b57a9a7947783a5a4910.
  10. Zorkin V.D. The letter and spirit of the Constitution. Rossiyskaya gazeta. URL: rg.ru/2018/10/09/zorkin-nedostatki-v-konstitucii-mozhno-ustranit-tochechnymi-izmeneniiami.html.
  11. Aranovskiy K.V. Separation of powers as a condition of constitutional democracy. Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya, 2012, no. 6, pp. 16–22.
  12. Dzidzoev R.M. The party system and issues of electoral democracy in Russia. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo, 2018, no. 3, pp. 36–38.
  13. Lebedev V.A. Government and Political Parties in the Present-Day Russia: Constitutional Law Issues of Interaction. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo, 2017, no. 11, pp. 26–30.
  14. The RF Government Decree dated the 26th of December 2016 No. 1498 “On the issues of the communal services providing and the maintenance of common property in an apartment building”. Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF, 2017, no. 2-I, st. 338.
  15. United Russia Legislatively Regulates House-Based Housekeeping Fees. Ryazanskoe informatsionnoe agentstvo. URL: 7info.ru/ryazan/ryazan-society/edinaja_rossija_zakonodatelno_ureguliruet_platu_za_obschedomovye_nuzhdy/.
  16. Constitution of the Republic of India from 11.26.1949. Konstitutsii gosudarstv (stran) mira: internet-biblioteka konstitutsiy Romana Pashkova. URL: worldconstitutions.ru/?p=28.
  17. Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh of 11.04.1972. Konstitutsii gosudarstv (stran) mira: internet-biblioteka konstitutsiy Romana Pashkova. URL: worldconstitutions.ru/?p=25.
  18. Federal Constitutional Law dated the 31st of December 1996 No. I-FKZ (ed. 25.12.2012) “About the judicial system of the Russian Federation”. Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF, 1997, no. 1, st. 1.
  19. The Eight Wonders of the Judicial System. Moskovskie novosti. URL: mn.ru/oped/77180.
  20. Kolesnikov E.V., Selezneva N.M. Status suda v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: konstitutsionnye voprosy [Court status in the Russian Federation: constitutional issues]. Saratov, Saratovskaya gosudarstvennaya akademiya prava Publ., 2008. 204 p.
  21. 1 to 466: why Russian courts began to justify even less often. RBK. URL: rbc.ru/society/25/04/2018/5added539a79477ac3e23377.
  22. Bobrova N.A. Reasons for legalization of election legal offences in judicial decisions. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo, 2015, no. 5, pp. 62–66.
  23. Bobrova N.A. Results of the Municipal Reform of 2014. Munitsipalnaya sluzhba: pravovye voprosy, 2018, no. 1, pp. 27–31.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies