On the problem of understanding justice as a legal category


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The global and systemic crisis that modern civilization is going through makes it necessary to improve the efficiency of the functioning of both government bodies and legal systems, the activities of these bodies and their regulatory officials. Despite the strict observance of formal legality in the activities of officials, civil society may refuse to trust and support them if such activities are perceived as unfair. In public opinion, the fairness of the activities of representatives of the government, therefore, can be considered as a necessary condition for the legitimacy of their activities. This kind of circumstance necessitates the formalization of the concept of justice and the inclusion of this concept into the language of legal documents. At present, an unambiguous understanding of the category of “justice” in domestic jurisprudence has not yet been formed. The paper presents the author’s concept of justice in law, concludes that it is necessary to formalize and institutionalize this concept, to sort out the legal category of “justice” from the categories of the same name developed in other social and humanitarian sciences. The greatest attention is paid to the applicability of the concept of justice to the intersectoral institution of legal responsibility. It has been established that in the Russian Federation the requirement to ensure fairness in the activities of government bodies and officials has actually acquired a constitutional character. However, the use of this concept in the Constitution of the Russian Federation cannot be recognized as consistent, and justice as a whole has an ambiguous character. The content and correlation of this concept with other legal categories is analyzed. The study allows us to speak about the existence of a legal category of justice, which does not coincide with the understanding of this concept in other areas of scientific knowledge. It is concluded that the changes made to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, as one of their main goals, have an increase in fairness in the organization of public administration. The paper emphasizes the possibility to reveal the legal content of the concept of justice through the requirements to ensure verity, proportionality and impartiality in the activities of the government bodies.

About the authors

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Ivanov

Togliatti State University, Togliatti

Author for correspondence.
Email: A.Ivanov18@tltsu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6171-7214

PhD (Law), Associate Professor, assistant professor of Chair of Constitutional and Administrative Law

Russian Federation

References

  1. Maltsev G.V. Sotsialnaya spravedlivost i pravo [Social justice and law]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1977. 255 p.
  2. Ekimov A.I. Spravedlivost i sotsialisticheskoe pravo [Justice and socialist law]. Leningrad, LGU Publ., 1980. 120 p.
  3. Orlando V. E. Printsipy konstitutsionnogo prava [Principles of constitutional law]. Moscow, V. M. Sablin Publ., 1907. 299 p.
  4. Smirnov A.V. 300 years of guarding the justice (formation and development of the institution of prosecution service). Zakonnost, 2021, no. 1, pp. 3–9. EDN: YCZZJB.
  5. Chechelnitskiy I.V. Institute of the high commissioner for human rights in the Russian Federation in the context of public request for social justice. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA), 2021, no. 4, pp. 54–63. doi: 10.17803/2311-5998.2021.80.4.054-063.
  6. Yulgusheva L.Sh. Analysis of fairness of personal income taxation in the Russian Federation. Lex russica (Russkiy zakon), 2021, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 82–94. doi: 10.17803/17295920.2021.172.3.082-094.
  7. Lukovskaya D.I., Malysheva N.I., Strogov N.D. G. Kelsen on natural law and justice: an argument on the right to resist. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA), 2021, no. 5, pp. 198–206. doi: 10.17803/2311-5998.2021.81.5.198-206.
  8. Khvostova A.V. The problem оf the relationship of legality, justice, expediency and legitimacy in law enforcement. Vestnik Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii, 2021, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 408–414. doi: 10.37973/KUI.2021.54.12.020.
  9. Danchevskaya A.V. Equality is not equal to justice: on the issue of confrontation in the protection of the rights of women and men. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava, 2022, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 91–102. doi: 10.17803/1994-1471.2022.138.5.091-102.
  10. Sherstneva A.V. Law and social justice (a constitutional and legal aspect). Elektronnoe prilozhenie k Rossiyskomu yuridicheskomu zhurnalu, 2021, no. 2, pp. 5–10. doi: 10.34076/22196838_2021_2_5.
  11. Galiev M.S. On the relationship of the right to protection from general legal principles right. Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika, 2018, no. 2, pp. 10–14. EDN: YBTDJB.
  12. Khachaturov R.L., Lipinskiy D.A. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti [General theory of legal responsibility]. Sankt Petersburg, Press Publ., 2007. 934 p.
  13. Lipinskiy D.A., Malko A.V., Musatkina A.A., Markunin R.S., Makareyko N.V., Kuzmin I.A., Stankin A.N., Chuklova E.V. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost v pravovoy sisteme Rossii: normativnye i pravorealizatsionnye problemy vzaimosvyazey, vzaimodeystviya i protivorechiy [Legal responsibility in the legal system of Russia: regulatory and legal implementation problems of relationships, interactions and contradictions]. Moscow, RIOR Publ., 2020. 658 p.
  14. Alekseev S.S. Filosofiya prava [Philosophy of law]. Moscow, Norma Publ., 1998. 337 p.
  15. Belonosov V.O., Kolesnikov E.V. The principle of legality in criminal proceedings and its interpretation by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2004, no. 5, pp. 51–57.
  16. Fedorova T.V. Is “Radbruch's formula” applicable in administrative justice? Grazhdanin i pravo, 2022, no. 3, pp. 69–82. EDN: MBEFGC.
  17. Chirkin V.E. The principle of social justice in the constitutional dimension. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo, 2013, no. 11, pp. 39–43. EDN: RPCNUH.
  18. Bobrova N.A. Obshcheteoreticheskiy i mezhotraslevoy aspekty yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti [General theoretical and intersectoral aspects of legal responsibility]. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2019. 544 p.
  19. Markin A.V. Logika yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti [Logic of legal responsibility]. Moscow, Nota Bene Publ., 2010. 218 p.
  20. Vovk E.V. Concretization of the idea of justice in criminal law and justice: conceptual and technical-legal aspects. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 2021, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 204–226. doi: 10.35427/2073-4522-2021-16-2-vovk.
  21. Nersesyants V.S. Right. Freedom. Democracy. (Materials of the round table). Voprosy filosofii, 1990, no. 6, pp. 3–21.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies