The concept of state sovereignty in the modern period


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Understanding, development, and significance of state sovereignty in international and domestic relations are a constant and burning issue of scientific research. However, over the last years, there is a growing tendency in the foreign and Russian science aimed at the disavowal of the concept of the sovereignty as an inalienable, undivided, and absolute power of the state, which leads both to the scientific disputes and the growth of tension at the state-by-state (international) level. The abovementioned determined the goal of this work: the scientific substantiation of the sovereignty as the most important, enduring characteristic and the base attribute of a state, as well as the formation of the concept according to which state sovereignty should be considered as a political and legal axiom aimed at the creation of a modern secure world order. The understanding of state sovereignty developed over several centuries includes the ability of a state to form and implement an individual, independent, and integral foreign and domestic policy, which means the supremacy of the state in the domestic and foreign policy. However, there are significant disagreements in understanding the nature, scope, implementation mechanism, and other factors of the formation and development of state sovereignty. In the paper, the author attempts to comprehend the pluralism of views on the concept of state sovereignty and to identify the consequences of artificial reducing the authority of the state sovereignty concept, proposes the justification for the inadmissibility of its disavowal. The author concludes that the concept of state sovereignty is actually the most important property of any state and scarcely depends on the influence of external factors, i.e. the sovereignty of the state cannot be limited since this contradicts, first of all, to its essence, and the disparagement and appeals to the state sovereignty abolition are the most dangerous tendency significantly increasing the level of tension in the world. State sovereignty is a symbol, the ideological framework of the world order and the existence of any state.

About the authors

Valery Nikolaevich Pyatkin

National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University, Saransk

Author for correspondence.
Email: speranzo2@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6038-3504

senior lecturer of Chair of State and Administrative Law

Russian Federation

References

  1. Zhukovskaya N.Yu., Kalinina E.V. State sovereignty and dialectics of its evolution in the modern context. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International law and international organizations, 2021, no. 4, pp. 76–88. doi: 10.7256/2454-0633.2021.4.37115.
  2. Alekseeva L.A., Mayorova S.A. On the issue of state sovereignty in the context of globalization. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii, 2022, no. 3, pp. 39–44. doi: 10.36511/2078-5356-2022-3-39-44.
  3. Vinogradova E.V., Polyakova T.A. On the place of information sovereignty in the constitutional legal sphere in modern Russia. Pravovoe gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika, 2021, no. 1, pp. 32–49. doi: 10.33184/pravgos-2021.1.3.
  4. Efremov A.A. State sovereignty in the conditions of digital transformation. Pravovedenie, 2019, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 47–61. doi: 10.21638/spbu25.2019.103.
  5. Mamedov V.R. The impact of technological progress on the transformation of the essence of state sovereignty. Innovatsii i investitsii, 2021, no. 8, pp. 21–25. EDN: XBSSFF.
  6. Dvoretskiy V.M. State sovereignty as a legal category in the context of the crisis of the modern system of international relations. Pravo i politika, 2019, no. 1, pp. 11–19. doi: 10.7256/2454-0706.2019.1.28700.
  7. Murtuzaliev R.R., Alieva M.N. The problem of state sovereignty in international law. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i kadry, 2022, no. 2, pp. 247–249. doi: 10.24412/2312-0444-2022-2-247-249.
  8. Katkov A.D. State sovereignty: problem of its interpretation and historical evolution of the principle. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2019, no. 3, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.7256/2454-0641.2019.3.29403.
  9. Ponomareva E.G., Rudov G.A. Printsip domino: mirovaya politika na rubezhe vekov [Domino effect: World policy on crossroad of ages]. Moscow, Kanon Publ., 2016. 312 p.
  10. Leksin I.V. Sovereignty and the state: conceptual interconnections and divergences. Rossiyskoe pravo: obrazovanie, praktika, nauka, 2018, no. 3, pp. 17–29. EDN: XZTEFF.
  11. Snyman-Ferreira M.P. The evolution of state sovereignty: A historical overview. Fundamina, 2006, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–28.
  12. Anghel I.-M. Subiectele de drept international. The subjects of international law. Bucharest, Lumina Lex Publishing House Publ., 1998, pp. 153–158.
  13. Vrabie G. Drept constitutional f institute politice contemporane. Constitutional law and contemporary political institutions. Iasi, TEAM Publ., 1995, pp. 245–249.
  14. Weber C. Simulating sovereignty: intervention, the state and symbolic exchange. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Publ., 1995. 164 p.
  15. Ulum M.B. Sovereignty and legal personality: A lesson from European Union's evolution to supranationalism. Lampung Journal of International Law, 2022, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 27–40. doi: 10.25041/lajil.v4i1.2517.
  16. Parasram А. Sovereignty. Showing Theory to Know Theory Understanding Social Science Concepts through Illustrative Vignettes. Ottawa, Showing Theory Press Publ., 2022. Vol. 1, pp. 453–462.
  17. Volk Ch. The Problem of Sovereignty in Globalized Times. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 2022, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 716–738. doi: 10.1177/1743872119828010.
  18. Krasner S.D. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, Princeton University Press Publ., 1999. 248 p.
  19. Fowler M.R., Bunck J.M. Law, Power, and the Sovereign State. The Evolution and Application of the Concept of Sovereignty. Philadelphia, Penn State University Press Publ., 1995. 214 p.
  20. Schermers H. Different Aspects of Sovereignty. State, sovereignty, and international governance. Oxford, Oxford University Press Publ., 2002, pp. 185–192.
  21. O’Sullivan D. ‘We Are All Here to Stay’: Citizenship, Sovereignty and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Canberra, ANU Press Publ., 2020. 250 p.
  22. Naylor R.S., Hunt C.A. Tourism and Livelihood Sovereignty: A Theoretical Introduction and Research Agenda for Arctic Contexts. Societies, 2021, vol. 11, no. 3, article number 105. doi: 10.3390/soc11030105.
  23. Ilin I.M. Sovereignty in the doctrine of constitutionalism: definition, problems. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V.N. Tatishcheva, 2020, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 96–106. EDN: SRWDYK.
  24. Kurilkina O.A. Institute of sovereignty: theoretical and practical understanding. Filosofiya prava, 2020, no. 4, pp. 12–15. EDN: ZCDAND.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c)



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies